itestyourcode

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by itestyourcode 4y ago

   Is it the same dilemma if we can kill one to save more?
2. 2.▲
   by itestyourcode 6y ago

   I agree a statement that Pulsar and RabbitMQ are two different products. I understand Pulsar could be missing key based binding, exchanging, and routing in RabbitMQ. (to certain extend, Pulsar Function and key based routing might be able to
3. 3.▲
   by itestyourcode 6y ago

   Full disclosure - I am co-founder of https://kesque.com . We provide Pulsar as a managed service and different tiers of SaaS plan. My opinion can be biased. For a new project, you should try to document different aspects of requ
4. 4.▲
   by itestyourcode 6y ago

   I agree shaving dozens or hundreds milliseconds of latency is hardly noticeable to end users. But latency is an indicator of how well the system can perform and scale up. Signs of high latency under normal load can reveal design or implemen
5. 5.▲
   by itestyourcode 6y ago

   Pulsar does offer a standalone mode. It has a vertical stack of Pulsar broker, bookkeeper, and zookeeper in one process. The standalone mode also comes in a single docker image. However, the complexity you refer to is essential in a reliabl
6. 6.▲
   by itestyourcode 6y ago

   Indeed https://kafkaesque.io/