itemize123

5 ms·

1.
by itemize123 7d ago
and still they denied it - it only shows that we have little recourse.
2.
by itemize123 8d ago
I think it's worse - openai didn't even deny training on their exact manuscript (when they most likely opted out);
3.
by itemize123 8d ago
it's buried because due to the drama the evidence is scarce
4.
by itemize123 8d ago
this is not untrue but it's a pendulum swinging back to ancient times man
5.
by itemize123 8d ago
I think you are overestimating things. While there will be people who don't know - it's probably not as many as you think.
6.
by itemize123 15d ago
interesting, c -> c++ transition should be smooth though
7.
by itemize123 15d ago
that's fair. but it outputted non-best version in the first place sometimes too. Now it still output non-best version sometimes.
8.
by itemize123 16d ago
literally not how it works.
9.
by itemize123 16d ago
so simply then ratio isn't just dl/up
10.
by itemize123 18d ago
naming schemes can produce uncountably inf names
11.
by itemize123 18d ago
i think there must be a scheme of naming that is uncountably infinite too.
12.
by itemize123 18d ago
that's optimizing a pretty fast already portion of code. unlikely it's the difference maker.
13.
by itemize123 21d ago
bigger than RotW
14.
by itemize123 21d ago
One, logically, your statement doesn't follow. They're two different companies that have primarily in different market segment. Two, it's not true in the first place - did we side with apple and its cut of the app store reven
15.
by itemize123 21d ago
not constructive, but also not personal. rude but based on observed facts.
16.
by itemize123 21d ago
ondemand cloud? b2b?
17.
by itemize123 23d ago
it's because it is a narrow set of never-pay-a-human. in that world, only certain task won't be done by human.
18.
by itemize123 24d ago
main reason is the 30days retention; not the plan changes
19.
by itemize123 26d ago
but surely u differentiate by turns?
20.
by itemize123 26d ago
such a weird thread because everyone seems to know what they are talking about but definitely seem to miss something. but basically one would be differentiating to 2pi x rather than x. and things will work out
21.
by itemize123 27d ago
i dont understand, isn't the arguing just some form prompt steering?
22.
by itemize123 27d ago
im sorry u feel this way
23.
by itemize123 27d ago
but, importantly, it is not the main reason why people are skeptical of bun rewrite right
24.
by itemize123 29d ago
it's just inaccurate data prior to microsft acq
25.
by itemize123 29d ago
the underlying cause of addiction is very different. But if there is enough evidence that they're similarly damaging (in magnitude), I think that fundamental difference is irrelevant.
26.
by itemize123 29d ago
how is it mutually exclusive
27.
by itemize123 1mo ago
exactly, I found that it's eerily similar to those marketing copies. gets obnoxious
28.
by itemize123 1mo ago
when you make assertions that can be checked, check them please. doubly check it when it's contrarian.
29.
by itemize123 1mo ago
question's phrasing made your judgement obvious
30.
by itemize123 1mo ago
what is lacking is a benchmark. I think the OP is trying to elicit that.

More ›