isthatart

6 ms·

1.
by isthatart 8y ago
From the pdf at the end of the article, this estimate is based on a study of 19000 consumers from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sw
2.
by isthatart 8y ago
The Science Advances article is http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/10/eaat3807 "Seventeen surgeons and 13 medical students participated in this study." According to Table S1 they were classifi
3.
by isthatart 8y ago
Links to drafts?
4.
by isthatart 8y ago
Ha, like Eve's sniffer ring from my Internet of Smells story http://telegra.ph/Internet-of-Smells-04-26
5.
by isthatart 8y ago
But what if it is not a copyright violation but it looks like one to some dumb filter? For say 0.5 million articles from arXiv?
6.
by isthatart 8y ago
Sure, they are not published illegally. IANAL but as I understand the process, is like this: the author submits to arXiv and either (a) gives arXiv a perpetual NON-EXCLUSIVE licence to distribute (which does not change the fact that the cop
7.
by isthatart 8y ago
But arXiv is not small, it has 1.4 million e-prints, is far bigger than most of other scientific platforms. It is non-commercial though.
8.
by isthatart 8y ago
Thank you. Anybody who has any influence in the discussion, please help to make this clear. It is important for the researchers, I think. In this particular case arXiv is by no means "small" (has 1.4 million articles) but is non-c
9.
by isthatart 8y ago
Well in mathematics and physics the usual thing to do is to first post on arXiv and then submit to the journal. ArXiv references are totally allowed. I heard that the situation is different in other fields but as you say this is not relevan
10.
by isthatart 8y ago
Right, will arXiv implement such filters? Same question for other green or gold OA platforms. We all know about Elsevier, but if I put my paranoid hat then for gold OA this is even more perverse, will they try to kill green OA (not that I b
11.
by isthatart 8y ago
Oh I replied to another comment. The answer is "no". Fact is that 1/3 (anyway a significant proportion which can be referenced) of the arXiv articles appear later in journals. So it is a totally credible concern. The arXiv ha
12.
by isthatart 8y ago
Why not? AFAIK about a 1/3 of the arXiv articles are later published in journals.
13.
by isthatart 8y ago
I'd like to see a discussion around these aspects. I see only cries re big platforms and news outlets.I'm neither of these.
14.
by isthatart 8y ago
Two more examples examples for arXiv and one for Figshare. (1) Article in journal has a flaw. For some reason the journal is slow or unhelpful concerning a correct version, so the author posts on arXiv a revised and perhaps much bigger vers
15.
by isthatart 8y ago
Example: article in arXiv gets later published in a journal. Will the arXiv article version be still available for anybody? Only for non-EU people? Will be removed from arXiv? None of these?
16.
by isthatart 8y ago
As a EU researcher, reader and author, I ask: does this reform affect my use of arXiv or say figshare? Until now I don't have a clear answer.
17.
by isthatart 8y ago
... and if in doubt you'd better call Saul!
18.
by isthatart 8y ago
Earth is flat and the theory of evolution is bogus. You will not allow and will not allow any third party to publish or provide any benchmark or comparison test results. Done with Science.
19.
by isthatart 8y ago
True for both comments. In the case of the "ideal" lisp machine, in my mind should be something which rewrites local patterns in memory, randomly, in many places. It is possible, theoretically. Multiheaded TMs can also be seen in
20.
by isthatart 8y ago
My guess is that because the accent was put on serial computations. I may be wrong but for for me the big selling point of a(n ideal) lisp machine is that if made right you could cut the machine in half and get two lisp machines. Conversely
21.
by isthatart 8y ago
Or chemlambda https://github.com/chorasimilarity/chemlambda-gui/blob/gh-pa...
22.
by isthatart 8y ago
See section V Simulation Results https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.05308.pdf
23.
by isthatart 8y ago
Latest version https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.10228v2 For me the takeaway message is: "Fabric is the first blockchain system to support the execution of distributed applications written in standard programming languag
24.
by isthatart 8y ago
After more reading, it is horrible. Even if the answers seem to be (0) no (1) maybe (2) yes, the main point of interest for researchers is that they will become publishers slaves, or else they have to not publish (anything which might resul
25.
by isthatart 8y ago
Open Science fan here, I have some concrete questions about this copyright, publishers and linktax story, for example: (0) - will Scihub be affected? (1) - will arXiv link instead of the published article link be affected? (2) - will the s
26.
by isthatart 8y ago
More precisely, a 5 frames animation was encoded into bacterial DNA and retrieved in the genome of descendants after several generations https://www.nature.com/news/lights-camera-crispr-biologists-...
27.
by isthatart 8y ago
"Hey Mr. Gates It may be that the activation energy required to initiate changes won’t arise within the system. In that case, an outside push might do the job, and the best place for this push to come from may be a nimble funding agenc
28.
Hey Mr. Gates (We Need a GitHub of Science) (2011)(marciovm.com)
1 points by isthatart 8y ago|1 comments
29.
by isthatart 8y ago
Please post the list of all sites you visited in the past year and you'll get an absolutely serious answer.
30.
by isthatart 8y ago
This and the references https://figshare.com/articles/Chemlambda_strings/5751318

More ›