Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
irfansharif
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
irfansharif
4y ago
If you're just using the pre-compiled binaries, this Go patch is baked in. If you're building the CockroachDB binary from source, and are just following our usual build steps using Bazel, you'll get this stuff as is. There&#x
2.
▲
Rubbing control theory on the Go scheduler
(cockroachlabs.com)
37 points
by
irfansharif
4y ago
|
3 comments
3.
▲
Show HN: SAT Solver/Constraint Programming library in Go
(github.com)
5 points
by
irfansharif
5y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
irfansharif
5y ago
(crdb eng) I'm not sure what "document DB" means here, mind elaborating?
5.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
Yes, the distributed backup/restore functionality was folded into the free version in our last release. See https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/distributed-backup-restor... .
6.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
(crdb eng here) I'll shamelessly call out that distributed backup/restore, which was previously in our enterprise offering, was moved into the free one. Internally a large part of that decisions was driven by the "suggestions
7.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
Click around through the rest of their blog if you're interested in what those tradeoffs are. Let's not spread FUD unnecessarily.
8.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
It's not, not at all. We've actually gone as far as replacing RocksDB with https://github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/ by default now (and it's written in Go).
9.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
what "data warehousing"/"data management" tools are missing?
10.
▲
(CMU talk) Building Materialize: Streaming Database powered by Timely Dataflow
(materialize.io)
12 points
by
irfansharif
6y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
Living Without Atomic Clocks
(cockroachlabs.com)
14 points
by
irfansharif
6y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
by
irfansharif
6y ago
> Note that neither CockroachDB [...] use Golang for their actual storage engine We do, now. We're looking to move away from RocksDB to https://github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/ .
13.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
Congrats on the launch! If you're looking at CockroachDB (looking at some other comment on this thread), you should reach out to us if you haven't already. Your design here seems like the exact kind of thing we're hoping to p
14.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
(Linked in the post but) github repo: https://github.com/MaterializeInc/materialize
15.
▲
Materialize: A Streaming Data Warehouse
(materialize.io)
262 points
by
irfansharif
7y ago
|
100 comments
16.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
I have no idea what you're saying. What's a "row-oriented storage" if not storing all the column values of a row in sequence, in contrast to storing all the values in a column across the table in sequence (aka "colu
17.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
> Actually, I always believed that the internal key-value store that they use would never scale to represent table workloads. Care to elaborate here? As someone working at that layer of the system, our RocksDB usage is but a blip in any
18.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
> Just, please, pretty please, give us a --insecure Have you taken a look at [0]? (All caveats around running an insecure cluster apply) [0]: https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/stable/deploy-cockroachdb...
19.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
TrueTime is not a publicly available GCP service.
20.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
We take our claims if correctness very seriously. The behavior you're describing, depending on exactly what you're doing, is likely an allowed serializable history, which is the isolation level we claim to support. See [0] for a d
21.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
CockroachCloud has public pricing. https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/cockroachcloud/stable/coc...
22.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
As someone working for crdb, I disagree with you re: "the whole point is that it enables Google scale". There's a wide gulf up to that point that cockroachdb is still imminently useful for, especially considering the alternat
23.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
CockroachDB runs the Jepsen test suite nightly. We've been following along Aphyr's recent test additions (`multi-register` for instance, which immediately caught [0]), porting them over when appropriate. We definitely have work to
24.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
v20.1 is slated for release in April.
25.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
Those numbers are surprising to me. Have latency charts to share? And are you using think time? http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/detail.asp
26.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
> cdb went with Go but their storage layer ended up being rewritten with C, The storage layer was not rewritten in C, it's just RocksDB. There's ongoing work to use a custom built LSM store instead: https://github.co
27.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
The core shopify codebase is a monolithic one, hence the merging infrastructure described in the post. It's not a "single project" in any useful definition of the phrase.
28.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
Not technically open-source (BSL-licensed), but yes, source available on https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/ .
29.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
You can find our more recent performance numbers on https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/v19.2/performance.html
30.
▲
by
irfansharif
7y ago
Because we blogged about our new vectorized sql engine[1] & our new parallel commit protocol[2] recently, two "big"-ish engineering lifts that were packed into this one release. [1]: https://www.cockroachlabs.com&#x
More ›