Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iotb
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Indeed. I don't see anyone born in the 80s/90s dictating policies or in politics. I see the same boomers that sold this country's middle class up the river still doing what they do best. Gray and white hair, wealth from a car
2.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Children want a lot of things that aren't good for them. If they have bad parents or their environmental conditions are down-trotten enough, it's not a mystery of what becomes of the majority of them. Democracies are a viscous fee
3.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/04/angkor-wat-civil...
4.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
There's no mystery to how prior civilizations hit collapse events when I read comments like this. Every system has a limit, if you don't believe this is the case, you'll likely hit it in catastrophic fashion. In the year 2018
5.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
I don't recall pinning them all on capitalism. That is a typical false classification someone engages in who wants to dismiss any real world analysis of the underlying causes. Then you go on to argue from this basis for the remainder o
6.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
You make things wildly unaffordable. You make the most basic need of a human being (a roof over their head a ponzi scheme speculative investment) You destroy the middle class. You plunge everyone into debt with over- financialization. You p
7.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
He says it. Others have done it years ago.
8.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
To make an accurate projection or statement about something, it is generally necessary that you have a sound understanding of it. This is just my general intelligence speaking here. I see nothing of note that reflects that this person has a
9.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
You're focusing on an aspect of Neurons in which there isn't even an accurate understanding and attempting to make a direct mapping to computer hardware. This is framing w/o understanding and you should be able to clearly und
10.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
If only this wasn't an fundamentally flawed theory that isn't scalable based on computational complexity and information theory.
11.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Entrenched mindsets don't like for the flaws in their views to be highlighted. It's one of Humanity's most serious flaws. As far as AGI being 10-20 years away based purely on compute power, you can't make this statement
12.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
It mainly comes down to the software and algorithmic techniques. It's not something many people want to hear as there is a lot of money and effort placed on an alternative framing. If you believe it takes massive amount of hardware
13.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
What are your thoughts on Starting over completely from scratch as Geoffrey Hinton has suggested? What are you doing as a group to attract and bring on such individuals? Does this occupy any portion of your efforts at OpenAI? If you were gi
14.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Accelerating the efficiency of an optimization algorithm doesn't get you AGI, this should be clear by now. As for fielding such systems, one quick way to destroy humanity to a degree is to turn everything into a glorified optimization
15.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Did Artificial General Intelligence get redefined again towards something more short term? So, first AI is hijacked and hyped 50 ways to sunday.. Then came the apocalyptic narratives/control problem hype to secure funding for non-profi
16.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
> My feeling is that humans are not adaptive to changing game flows either. They are. I'd actually argue that this occurs much more in a pub game than with pros. I'm largely against the concept of a pro for this reason as it am
17.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
> We do not know for sure in the case of OpenAI Five as there are too few public games to look at. Thus the nature of a canned showcase demo. We do know they have a slew of restrictions. As an avid player, I know exactly why : because su
18.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
I have thousands of hours logged playing various Dota variants. I rarely watch as it's not a good way to retain skills or understand what's going on. If you play enough, you should understand exactly what I'm saying. I watch
19.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
I'm an active player with enough hours logged to interpret the game. That being said, the observations should also be obvious to even the most novice player. I don't need a commercialized and obviously favorable and biased stream
20.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
Yep. This is clear to even a novice player to be a strategically chosen death ball/snowball configuration. Some of the least skilled players in Dota shoot for it but is undone by a broader range of unironically named 'intelligence
21.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
There's a presiding team value function that impacts and steers team play. The bots 'communicate' through this. There's nothing magical going on. As a counter bot strategy, I'd work on how to break and trick it usin
22.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
As someone who plays Dota, the matches were a clear demonstration of sloppy snowballing and brute force cheesing. Coordination 'appears' to be beyond human level because the bots are collectively synced on a team goal value. If a
23.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
If it were a priority vs other items, it would have been done. It's not a priority and one of the last things on the list because doing so exposes their Bot to a much broader range of intellectual challenge as per the game design. Now,
24.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
When they demo'd this over a year ago, they gave the human player a laundry list of instructions and the bot was still defeated once the keen human player used their intellect to analyze what was going on and 'break the bot'.
25.
▲
by
iotb
8y ago
As a seasoned player of Dota watching the replays, I can see exactly what's going on. There's lots of snowballing/cheese which are the least common denominators of gameplay and least intellectual. Such dynamics would no doubt
26.
▲
by
iotb
9y ago
Inferiority nor superiority was argued. So, quite frankly, this doesn't fall into this category. You can admit to a difference without falling privy to pseudo-science. Men and women's brains are structurally and chemically differe
27.
▲
by
iotb
9y ago
Please define what's Regressive about plain facts... > it's starting to get to me how so many people in an innovative sphere seem to have such a hard time with this The prevailing (cultural) attitude is clearly against plain fa
28.
▲
by
iotb
10y ago
Why is there such low activity on this thread vs the OpenAI thread?
29.
▲
by
iotb
10y ago
Does OpenAI Universe communicate in any way with OpenAI remotely regarding activity in OpenAI Universe? Essentially, are there any call-home aspects to the code base? Or, is it possible to run this locally without any outside communication?