invig

8 ms·

1.
by invig 8mo ago
Your argument is that Elon isn't grandiose enough with his statements and timelines?
2.
by invig 8mo ago
We tried to scale "University". Turns out it doesn't scale well.
3.
by invig 10mo ago
That's not quite true, what they can measure with the "tap on tap off devices" is people's movement patterns (point to point). That is valuable data that you can't really get just by counting people on and off or ta
4.
by invig 1y ago
This is a problem that needs to be solved. I guess we should have solved it before the regulators got involved, alas, here we are.
5.
by invig 1y ago
The debate stage is a deliberately constrained environment. The world and where it goes doesn't work like that.
6.
by invig 1y ago
Summary: "Users get to decide if they trust Apple. Users shouldn't get to decide if they trust anyone else."
7.
by invig 2y ago
Why bound it to the US Federal service?
8.
by invig 2y ago
I get what you're trying to say, but 'ideologically diverse' doesn’t really work that way—it’s about ideas, not how things look on the surface.
9.
by invig 2y ago
You don't really mean "ideologically" there do you?
10.
by invig 2y ago
What percentage should there be?
11.
by invig 2y ago
People who take disgruntled actions are definitely the kind of people you want working for you.
12.
by invig 2y ago
Name the values.
13.
by invig 2y ago
Well working? Estimated FY 2025 deficit is $1.9 trillion. If they had stopped ALL defense spending they would still lose over $1 trillion dollars in FY25.
14.
by invig 2y ago
Makes sense that the kind of people who would flip to espionage against their country are the exact kind of people you'd want to keep employed by your government.
15.
by invig 2y ago
You can make up absolutely anything and call it an unstated goal.
16.
by invig 2y ago
White men can't be ideologically diverse?
17.
by invig 2y ago
You're not seriously making the case that the government was hiring strictly based on merit are you?
18.
by invig 2y ago
Given that in all cases interpretation is required, are you trying to make the claim that the President (who is elected and can be voted out) should not make the interpretation, and that some employee who is not elected and works for them s
19.
by invig 2y ago
GPT-4 is absolutely incredible and even if we never get beyond it the world is a much better place with it than without it. It makes total sense to bet on the team that made this being the best placed people in the world to advance it.
20.
by invig 2y ago
I don't want to unlock to the home screen, I want to unlock to Apple Notes or Notion or whatever your favourite flavour of notes app is. Being allowed to replace the home screen with some app would be game changing for making the devic
21.
by invig 2y ago
Apple and Google will do that, no one else will be allowed to. Even if you could get the necessary device permissions (you can't), you're going to get sherlocked and be dead next year when Apple and Google bake whatever interestin
22.
by invig 2y ago
I don't agree that you can decide for someone what a net transfer to them is.
23.
by invig 2y ago
> everyone else in your industry also has the extra $15 now too, so you're not really at any competitive disadvantage So you're all worse off is a good solution?
24.
by invig 2y ago
Yes, but it's all individuals making decisions.
25.
by invig 2y ago
Driving a car is like smoking?
26.
by invig 2y ago
"It's not that bad". It is.
27.
by invig 2y ago
Ever needed more stuff than you could fit in a backpack at work? Ever bought something too big to carry on a bus?
28.
by invig 2y ago
This.
29.
by invig 2y ago
<3 Sometimes you've got to carry some stuff with you and cars a great at that. Less affluent people getting penalised for needing some stuff to do a job is pretty brutal. No amount of public transport fixes this.
30.
by invig 2y ago
Sometimes you've got to carry more stuff than you can fit in a backpack.

More ›