Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
inventitech
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
inventitech
8y ago
Thanks for the explanation. And hi, Alex (cool to meet again here on HN)!
2.
▲
by
inventitech
8y ago
Yup, perhaps that's why it's missing in the latest PowerShell release ... https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/Microsoft...
3.
▲
by
inventitech
8y ago
I am not sure which implementation Excel uses under the hood -- Excel's flash fill feature has been there for quite some time; PROSE (which strans uses) has not, and Excel is not listed in its impact section. So this seems to hint at t
4.
▲
by
inventitech
8y ago
Oh, I now see the ambiguity you refer to. What about this: Strans – an alternative to sed that automatically learns from examples, instead of having to program yourself Unfortunately, I can't change the title anymore
5.
▲
Show HN: Strans – Sed alternative that automatically learns from examples
(github.com)
158 points
by
inventitech
8y ago
|
19 comments
6.
▲
Become a Travis CI Log Miner in the MSR Mining Challenge 2017
(blog.travis-ci.com)
1 points
by
inventitech
10y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
What We Learned about Continous Integration from 2+ Million Travis Builds
(blog.travis-ci.com)
7 points
by
inventitech
10y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
When, How, and Why Developers (Do Not) Test [pdf]
(st.ewi.tudelft.nl)
1 points
by
inventitech
11y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
inventitech
12y ago
The first step is just to observe how much time is spent on testing. We have basically no clue about this. And our first study with students has also shown that they had no clue about it. In a second step, we can think about which implicati
10.
▲
by
inventitech
12y ago
I generally agree with you. "sometimes easy testing is not actually useful and useful testing is cost-prohibitive." While I agree here, too, I think that the situation where testing is not useful happens very rarely in practice. E
11.
▲
by
inventitech
12y ago
Yes, this is certainly true to a (I think) minimal extend. Why? Because improving the time you spend on testing is something that is essentially hard to do -- and only a meta-information, anyway. An example: A quality assessment of your cod
12.
▲
by
inventitech
12y ago
> But I'm not quite sure if there is a direct correlation between time spent writing tests and overall software quality? Good point. We do not know, either. That is part of the reason why we do this research. :) As has been said bef
13.
▲
How (Much) Do You Test?
(codetrails.com)
16 points
by
inventitech
12y ago
|
12 comments