intheleantime

6 ms·

1.
by intheleantime 7mo ago
Building AI coding tools, there are two common options. The AI suggests code and you run it. Or the AI runs code on your actual machine. We decided to go with the third option: The AI gets its own computer. Sandboxed Linux workspaces that C
2.
Show HN: CoChat MCP – Let your team review what your coding agent is building(github.com)
5 points by intheleantime 7mo ago|0 comments
3.
by intheleantime 8mo ago
There is something to be said about that, I agree. For that reason you can turn off memory inside a chat thread and also create temporary ones that do not use memory.
4.
by intheleantime 8mo ago
Thank you and great question. Right now, feedback is qualitative only. (Surveys, feedback buttons, controlled user tests). We are trying to build AI evaluators but they suffer from the same problem when trying to evaluate whether the “right
5.
We built memory that respects privacy in group chats(cochat.ai)
3 points by intheleantime 8mo ago|4 comments
6.
by intheleantime 8mo ago
lol the I stands for “I think I know everything”
7.
Building multi AI awareness in AI group chats(cochat.ai)
1 points by intheleantime 8mo ago|2 comments
8.
Show HN: Flowshapr – Open-Source Agent Flow GUI and Manager(github.com)
2 points by intheleantime 1y ago|0 comments
9.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Thanks for the feedback! I agree with the general sentiment. At the same time we want to target companies that are aware of their neurodiverse workforce.
10.
Leantime: Project Management System for People with ADHD(leantime.io)
5 points by intheleantime 3y ago|3 comments
11.
Open Source Jira Alternative Leantime Releases 3.0(leantime.io)
4 points by intheleantime 3y ago|0 comments
12.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Thanks! There is so much more to come!
13.
by intheleantime 3y ago
This is something we thought about a lot as well; right now it's just an emoji rating. Once set the picker changes to a checked mark and is not visible to others. The data is stored in the db but not visible to others in the system.
14.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Not just investors. I had long conversations with legal about that to better understand why it is necessary. Don't get me wrong, I don't like it either but here is the deal: - I want this project to be a success (and open source)
15.
by intheleantime 3y ago
That is the entire cycle from browser, to server and back + js execution. As mentioned in a comment below php execution including db call is: P95 is 120.9ms P99 is 634.11ms Which means the rest is DNS lookups and js execution.
16.
by intheleantime 3y ago
PS I forgot to mention that we have Sentry profiling. Full Application load (php side) P95 is 120.9ms and P99 is 634.11ms
17.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Hi, thanks for the question. It is a simple PHP application using Mysql as the database backend. We are using a domain driven design architecture across the application and decided to skip the slow ORMs in favor of a repository layer with h
18.
by intheleantime 3y ago
We got Google Analytics and Clarity on the site. Not sure that is out of the ordinary. The site should still work with pihole though, so I'll take a look at that.
19.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Huh, not sure I would agree with that. We have some overlapping feature set but I would argue Leantime looks a bit better but I may be biased :D The key differentiators are our goal and strategy tracking though.
20.
by intheleantime 3y ago
I agree, there is a real challenging disconnect between messaging for PMs/Leaders vs individual contributors and it boils down to organization size. Small companies and startups tent to be a lot more democratic about their choice of to
21.
by intheleantime 3y ago
"You can even have and keep changes (unpublished) for you entire organization " -- add to that that the organization should have access to the source code, yes. That doesn't mean that you need to publish the code outside of y
22.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Thank you for the feedback! Don't hear a lot of people say anything positive about AGPL these days... :)
23.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Thank you for the feedback! Our table views as well as the list views allow grouping by status and will show the vertical groups as you described. Is that what you are looking for? There are a couple screenshots on the repo. (Though they sh
24.
by intheleantime 3y ago
I really appreciate your feedback here and I see where you're coming from and can agree if you're looking at Jira as a purely bug tracking / development tool. Unfortunately, and I think important to call out -- is that most c
25.
by intheleantime 3y ago
We feel like the free cloud plan is the way to go -- by keeping our core features free, we think it's the "level up" PM features that start to bring value worth paying for.
26.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Thanks, and I agree. We spend the last 4 months working on a plugin infrastructure including events, api, plugin management etc so that we can now focus on building integrations. The next 3 months or so will be heads down integration work.
27.
by intheleantime 3y ago
I think there is a misunderstanding of the license(s) here: "But as soon as you want to customize and keep the changes, they want to charge you" Neither GPL nor AGPL require you to submit anything back (or charges you) for changes
28.
by intheleantime 3y ago
That is BS. Affero is not any different to GPL but the fact that network distribution is included in its definition of "distributing software" and having to relicense under the same license. Where do you even get this from?
29.
by intheleantime 3y ago
The problem most users face when starting out with Jira (or any other tool for that matter) is they don't know how to get started with a process. Leantime starts with some pre-defined worfklows following industry best practices. You ca
30.
by intheleantime 3y ago
Correct but the reason for that is the fact that all of the sudden companies are forced to contribute back if they want to offer commercial software on top of the labor of OSS projects. Again, I agree with the reasoning for libraries, devTo

More ›