intelijstupide

5 ms·

1.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
This is why I added the caveat. It's a culture question mostly but figuring it out is obvious when you think a bit about the kind of work you're doing. If your work is customer facing, there is a good chance you're selling a
2.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
Switch into ecommerce or marketing. Product companies suck. Product companies: selling your software as a product means you're always going to feel like you're on an assembly line. Except you're not the assembly line worker,
3.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
I checked out of this industry about 10 years ago. Its either toxic af, snowflake participation trophies or some narcissistic hellscape inbetweeen. Just punching paychecks and doing my hobbies on the side. > side hustles I gave up on the
4.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
Wow thank's for that link. Bridged a few gaps for me between what I remember from c++ and what I've been learning in rustlings.
5.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
Anywhere you picked this up from I could read more about? Fellow npm-syndrome avoider.
6.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
> fragile base class problem I do wonder whether this is as much of a problem as people think. Most of the time it only becomes a problem when people start doing stupid things to override the parent instead of refactoring a new class out
7.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
I'm not bad mouthing anyone. I wasn't even specifically targeting vite. I just simply don't care for the people in the industry that think they have ownership over my time. If they want me to use their shit, they need to make
8.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
The author doesn't disagree with the HTTP RFC at all. All the author disagrees with is mixing the http server layer and application client layer status codes in the same client response being given to users. The only argument anyone sh
9.
by intelijstupide 4y ago
> It would be difficult or impossible with most observabilty platforms to make it parse the http response Yea, because they've all been built on top of the same faulty assumption. This isn't a counter argument to the OP in any