integraleq

5 ms·

1.
Racemi - Windows Developer
1 points by integraleq 15y ago|0 comments
2.
by integraleq 16y ago
Sorry that I did not mention that part: This was actually for a job interview. So, it had to be completed in a short amount of time.
3.
by integraleq 16y ago
Man, that game is so much fun!! It gets really hectic at points! What are the guys the spit junk at you called? Are they like bosses?
4.
by integraleq 16y ago
You are correct about the representation, but I went for the most low-scale approach since the search space is so small. The next version will learn how to build its own rules, but that is for another day. Thanks for all of your help though
5.
by integraleq 16y ago
You are correct. So I suppose I should alter my previous post by saying that it is a good way to go iff you are also willing to be diligent in your updates to keep the documentation as current as possible.
6.
by integraleq 16y ago
Ok!!! Round 2! Any challengers?
7.
by integraleq 16y ago
Thanks a ton! I will tighten it up! Hopefully, you will pull the next release and try to beat it again. I do hope it was not a complete pushover.....
8.
by integraleq 16y ago
I personally look for a neat collection of tasks that I would be performing as well as a required skill set that I actually have. I used to really want to do telecommuting, but have since backed out of that desire since it tends to give you
9.
by integraleq 16y ago
That is not a bug. It is there because these locations are just not initialized. How did you manage to beat the cpu? Can you remember the last state of the game board which led to your victory? Thanks.
10.
by integraleq 16y ago
Check this link out: It might help you. http://www.amazon.com/Cracking-Coding-Interview-Fourth-Progr...
11.
by integraleq 16y ago
That is a real dilemma. If you feel more connected here, then it makes more sense to stay here. Of course, I understand that this might mean that you would have to work for an employer for 7-9 years, but I think that this will give you time
12.
by integraleq 16y ago
You should always be honest. If you are worried about them thinking that the startup will interfere with your work at the company, just be consistent in doing what you say you will do and do not do startup stuff when you should be working.
13.
by integraleq 16y ago
Which part did you find buggy? I would like to tighten it up. Thanks!
14.
Can You Beat This Game?
2 points by integraleq 16y ago|14 comments
15.
by integraleq 16y ago
I would still say that it is better to expect failure. That way, when you succeed it is more of an 'oh, ok.' moment than something that causes you to think too highly of yourself. Once I personally learned to get over the fact that I am sma
16.
by integraleq 16y ago
I would agree with you, but I think there is something to be said for the kind of mental dexterity it takes to do higher-level thinking while having a detailed view of what you are trying to accomplish. I would not want to give up all lower
17.
by integraleq 16y ago
I would also agree with that sentiment. What you do on a consistent basis more than likely becomes "short-circuited" into your mental perception of the world that you navigate from day to day. Much like not using a programming language that
18.
by integraleq 16y ago
this is an excellent post and quite relevant. i have found this kind of epiphany as well while writing a python based framework at my company. i would extend the README driven approach to even suggest a developer blog driven design methodol
19.
by integraleq 16y ago
Interesting! I am in Springfield,MO. I am not looking for a job, but how can I keep up with what your startup is doing? Could you send me info on what your company is about? Thanks!