Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
intabli
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
intabli
8mo ago
https://www.intabli.com Password-protected resume! (Not really secure).
2.
▲
Show HN: CSuite.Now – Access a full bench of AI-driven C-suite advisors
(csuite.now)
2 points
by
intabli
10mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
Most world governments and taxing authorities work for their populace, they could be easily voted out if people saw what other nations are benefiting from such innovation. As for what’s feasible and evidence on it, I assure you, Edison had
4.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
Uncapped is a pseudo name for “capped just in time”. It’s never really uncapped. If you’re interested in some work being done on such larger blocks, you’ll enjoy this presentation: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5SJm2ep3X_M&a
5.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
You mentioned it before that I did. And no I don’t want you to pump it, but answer the following yes/no questions please: -) Did your article discuss miner profit from finding Bitcoin? -) Did you mention that Bitcoin’s emission halves
6.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
One increase every time its theoretical limit is approached, which becomes exponential as transaction growth becomes exponential.
7.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
If transactions scale enough for you to be able to shut down most bank branches, end commutes for all banking and central banking employees, shut down all credit card companies and their offices and terminals, turn off ATMs, end printing ph
8.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
I needed to clarify that it wasn’t my proposal, as to how to gradually approach this, test nets are already deployed on many of the uncapped networks, I believe you’ll enjoy this great presentation by Peter Rizun and Andrew Stone, they’re f
9.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
Ethereum is account based, not UTXO based, has a completely different overhead and you can’t possibly compare it to Bitcoin.
10.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
I think you will enjoy this great presentation by Peter Rizun and Andrew Stone: https://youtu.be/5SJm2ep3X_M
11.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
If you measure value by the thing Bitcoin came to replace (fiat), your vision will be distorted. If you measure value as a consequence of utility, they’re certainly far more valuable than BTC (BSV however is a corp coin and has weird copyri
12.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
My proposal? I won’t take credit for Satoshi’s work, it was his proposal: https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/485/
13.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
When you discuss miners, on a network DESIGNED to emit less Bitcoin and change to transaction fees down the line, it’s ultra important to note that this actually working vehicle exists and the same miners protecting the speculative vehicle
14.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
But you make it seem as if it’s a done tale, as if there were no bad actors, no companies set to profit from selling their own “Layer 2” solutions, no censorship, etc. Reality is, even if the whole planet (not only the 99% of the community
15.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
I won’t point you to any, but you should dig deeper into the 2017 block size wars and understand why the community forked then and how, avoid the commercially appealing answers and the laser eyes.
16.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
Correct, the fees would decrease, but when when you can only process 200k transactions every ten minutes, there’s an upper limit of how much people are willing to pay before it becomes absurdly expensive. This reached almost $100 in the 201
17.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
These uncapped forks do exist, they’re the reason the whole community split in 2017; so when those “analysis” articles ignore them and ignore the fact that the white paper and Bitcoin’s creator explicitly called for on-chain growth and scal
18.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
What renders this whole calculation wrong is that it doesn’t account for transaction fees AND transaction fees growth which was also supposed to be growing exponentially, had Bitcoin not been artificially limited to ~ 2 MB blocks every ten
19.
▲
by
intabli
4y ago
Yet another attack on peer to peer electronic cash, masquerading as a benefit handed over by the amazing thoughtful overlords to their ignorant peasants. Cryptocurrency is CURRENCY, meant to be spent and replaced and worked for, not “Hodl b
20.
▲
by
intabli
7y ago
It’s not sound engineering whatsoever, it actually is horrible engineering especially when the base layer is congested - Engineers and developers who are far more proficient than you have already chimed in on this, including Vitalik the cre
21.
▲
Updated: All Your ICOs are belong to us
(linkedin.com)
1 points
by
intabli
8y ago
|
0 comments
22.
▲
IBM Goes Live with First Commercial Blockchains
(coindesk.com)
2 points
by
intabli
10y ago
|
0 comments