int3trap

5 ms·

1.
by int3trap 8d ago
Trump claimed they stole the election immediately, and people agreed with him immediately. There's no false equivalence here. He did the same thing in this past election even despite winning. It's a perfect example of people wanti
2.
by int3trap 8d ago
This is the academic equivalent of Trump saying "they stole the election". There's no proof of it but rah rah fuck OpenAI. It's incredibly tiresome and you'd think people could put more effort into it than just foll
3.
by int3trap 13d ago
Seems to be back.
4.
by int3trap 16d ago
It could have been a member of the tribe that was disabled and had nothing but time. There's evidence to suggest that individuals like that weren't simply discarded. There are a number of plausible explanations including just some
5.
by int3trap 28d ago
That's not been my experience at all with Sol. I've provide it escape hatch tools to stop execution and I've found it's been TOO eager to stop a request user approval to move forward.
6.
by int3trap 2mo ago
This comment feels like it's meant to be deprecating. The content of the post is interesting regardless of whether or not it was AI generated.
7.
by int3trap 2mo ago
> but why does everybody want to be a prophet? Its not everyone building crystal palaces in their mind, they're all building fortresses. And they can't be wrong in their fortress or it breaks their world view which they canno
8.
by int3trap 2mo ago
Comments like this always make me lol. It's a pointless comment. Do something about it if you think the government doesn't represent you. Or shut the fuck up.
9.
by int3trap 2mo ago
5.6 SOL is basically useless, even on fast mode. It takes so long to do anything that it would be faster to do yourself. And it burns usage so quickly it's genuinely not worth it.
10.
by int3trap 3mo ago
No. Customers will pay more across all markets.
11.
by int3trap 3mo ago
The article does not say that. The author doesn't take the text the other person dumped into ChatGPT and evaluate its quality. That is what OP is referring to.
12.
by int3trap 3mo ago
1. People don't like medium, rightly so. 2. The content is lower quality.
13.
by int3trap 4mo ago
Got a link to your project? I'm working on something that could make use of something like this.
14.
by int3trap 5mo ago
> regardless of what the contract or the law says That is not really established. The Anthropic issue was specifically about DoD use and Anthropic's military use restrictions. What the Trump admin did was bad and coercive but its no
15.
by int3trap 5mo ago
Honestly I find comments like yours much more eerie. By all accounts they never agreed to any of that but you say it with such confidence like it's a fact.
16.
by int3trap 6mo ago
Not using a computer eventually meant failing to use the basic medium of modern work. Not using an LLM does not yet imply the same thing.
17.
by int3trap 8mo ago
> So it's possible to have a pipelined connection stash away a continuation for a response calculation and be woken up later on when it's ready. Ahh, that's interesting. I think you still run into the issue where you have
18.
by int3trap 8mo ago
> In the steady state, a webserver would have almost no garbage collector activity I recently wrote my own zero allocation HTTP server and while the above statement is possible to achieve, at some point you need to make a decision on how
19.
by int3trap 8mo ago
Why don't you just not use LLM's if it sucks the joy out of the process for you?
20.
by int3trap 9mo ago
You can't say they are "in no way" commercially successful when they have around one BILLION monthly users. That's just disingenuous.
21.
by int3trap 10mo ago
Yeah... no it's not.
22.
by int3trap 10mo ago
> Wrong, it makes good designs easy to write It encourages good designs but it does not make them easy to write, but that's somewhat the point. Its not trivial to design a safe API that pushes performance limits. > just write a l
23.
by int3trap 10mo ago
This is top tier. Well written and insanely detailed.
24.
by int3trap 11mo ago
> Here's where SierraDB diverges from traditional distributed databases: reads don't require quorum. Would we say this is divergent? Cassandra, DynamoDB, and many others allow you to specify the consistency of reads at the requ
25.
by int3trap 11mo ago
There's been a massive talent exodus, especially among the principal and senior principal engineering roles, across all Amazon orgs since the RTO policies have been enforced. Its demoralizing to lose key engineers that you look up to a