inlined

17 ms·

1.
by inlined 26d ago
Reminds me of the time when my roommate wasn’t let into a bar soon after college because he had seriously bulked up since high school. We spent a half hour arguing, showing that all his credit cards are under his name and that even his work
2.
by inlined 2mo ago
Adobe’s ereaders had a disclaimer that their books cannot be read aloud. There’s clearly precedent that this sort of transformation was disallowed by publishers at the time. Interestingly, at least the audiobook of the latest dungeon crawle
3.
by inlined 2mo ago
To be fair Nick Fuentes praised him on his perfect Nazi salute
4.
by inlined 2mo ago
In good faith, what is your burden of proof that would change your mind?
5.
by inlined 2mo ago
That seems absolutely crazy to do. One could argue that the marginal cost to work for using a work laptop is zero and the work is still yours (still beyond the risk I’m willing to take). Using a company’s AI account is literally using the c
6.
by inlined 3mo ago
But Apple has always made their image quality not cost effectiveness. Pivoting here too drastically could sacrifice their image and backfire
7.
by inlined 3mo ago
But given the hoopla about how a driver’s license isn’t valid in the SAVE act because it doesn’t prove you’re a US citizen, how is drivers license verification going to satisfy the US national requirement here?
8.
by inlined 3mo ago
I know agents are out of scope of this RFC but I love that this could easily be extended to make the JS EventSource to work on streaming AI queries. Due to the need of bodies in requests, everyone uses POST and streaming results often use t
9.
by inlined 3mo ago
I think it can at least be said they are amoral not immoral. It’s a very low bar, but still
10.
by inlined 3mo ago
In honor of The Old New Thing I call these “Vogon vulnerabilities”: I have a marvelous exploit in mind that pwns anyone I have root access to
11.
by inlined 3mo ago
But it should be their job to protect against MitM in their threat model. There is no rational reason to exclude them from the bug bounty. Doing so only leaves MitM attacks like this undisclosed.
12.
by inlined 3mo ago
I’m not diagnosed face blind but I’m hoooooorble with names. It’s weird because I’ve been tested and score in the 98th percentile for memory generally. I hung out with a large group of people for nearly a decade and couldn’t remember who wa
13.
by inlined 3mo ago
So geo-gate it?
14.
by inlined 4mo ago
What are you withholding from the sandbox without making it useless?
15.
by inlined 5mo ago
That used to be my thing: wherever our ops manager declared something was impossible, I’d put my mind to proving her wrong. Even though we both knew she might declare something impossible prematurely to motivate me. My favorite was “it’s im
16.
by inlined 7mo ago
I think they’re talking about Apple fans, not laptop fans
17.
by inlined 8mo ago
Tbf, accepting a pardon is legally admitting guilt per SCOTUS and disgorgement would allow the funds to be sized
18.
by inlined 8mo ago
If the weak link is GPS, could they not accept an override for the time and spherical coordinates to connect?
19.
by inlined 8mo ago
No. Absolutely not. The opposite in fact. Your bash script is deterministic. You can send it to 20 AIs or have someone fluent read it. Then you can be confident it’s safe. An LLM will run the probabilistically likely command each time. This
20.
by inlined 8mo ago
There was a coffee shop ages ago in SF that would every few hours play a cacophony (e.g. multiple songs at once). I assume it was to drive away people camping on their laptops to rotate tables. Understand but super annoying to people like m
21.
by inlined 9mo ago
Google had achieved carbon neutrality and committed to wiping out their carbon legacy until AI.
22.
by inlined 10mo ago
As a user I suffer from not being able to freely use or derive my own work from Microsoft’s
23.
by inlined 10mo ago
Nice. I didn’t know I can now replace my “assertExhaustive” function. Previously you could define a function that accepted never and throws. It tells the compiler that you expect the code path to be exhaustive and fixes any return value exp
24.
by inlined 11mo ago
Is this meant to be a defense of the DNS protocol? I’ve never assumed the meme was that the DNS protocol is flawed, but that these changes are particularly sensitive/dangerous. At Google we noticed the main cause of outages are config
25.
by inlined 11mo ago
Mongo also has a good query language and a mongo DB can be seen as an array of documents
26.
by inlined 11mo ago
It sounds like you’re not at the scale where cloud storage is obviously useful. By the time you definitely need S3/GCS you have problems making sure files are accessible everywhere. “Grep” is a ludicrous proposition against large blob
27.
by inlined 11mo ago
Maybe they’re not using keepalives in their clients causing thousands of handshakes per second?
28.
by inlined 2y ago
Doubt that’s on the table unless Microsoft is also sued. Without a joint ruling this wouldn’t be balanced
29.
by inlined 2y ago
You actually should never return a specific error pointer because you can eventually break nil checks. I caused a production outage because interfaces are tuples of type and pointer and the literal nil turns to [nil, nil] when getting passe
30.
by inlined 2y ago
Go seems really sensitive to this subject. Maps iterate in order, but one day they said “this is incidental and we said not to rely on it. You do, so we’re breaking it in a minor release” and now maps iterate in order… from a random offset

More ›