injb

7 ms·

1.
by injb 1y ago
>>> But the root of gun violence is not what we think it is. Both the Left and Right, despite their heated disagreements, share an implicit assumption about gun violence: That before anyone pulls a trigger, they carefully weigh the
2.
by injb 2y ago
If it's just a drawing of a mouse, then anyone can create the same value by just drawing a different mouse. Of course, you can't because of the millions of dollars that have been pumped into that particular mouse. That investment
3.
by injb 2y ago
That's fair enough but it's an arbitrary place to draw the line. If you pay tax in the US then you build weapons. If you live in a country that doesn't either build weapons or pay someone else to build them for you, then you
4.
by injb 2y ago
Exactly. How is this so called problem even possible without the restaurants allowing it? If they don't like it, stop allowing it. If they don't care, then why should the public care?
5.
by injb 2y ago
US federal law excludes antiques from this, antiques being defined as 1898 or older.
6.
by injb 2y ago
>> I wanted to understand what Trump voters liked and didn’t like about the president, what they were nervous about, what they thought about the left’s response so far, and most importantly, what would convince them not to vote for hi
7.
by injb 2y ago
The most amazing theory I ever read was from The Second Messiah, which is totally fanciful and speculative, but even as a work of the imagination its strikingly impressive. What they said was that it's not fake, but its not exactly rea
8.
by injb 2y ago
That haircut made a comeback in the 90s in Ireland, usually with the head shaved pretty close except for the fringe over the eyes
9.
by injb 2y ago
What's the context here? What is he responding to?
10.
by injb 2y ago
So what though? I don't know exactly the reasoning for standing requirements, but they clearly weren't intended to prevent suits over things that affect millions of people in exactly the same way. I mean, standing would prevent ma
11.
by injb 2y ago
Does anyone else feel struck with a sense of shameful naivety when you discover (as I just did now) that your beloved local whatever store is actually a nationwide chain?
12.
by injb 2y ago
To ensure the natural advantage that strong people have over weak people, of course. Nature has ordained that the strong should subjugate the weak, and the equalizing force of firearms is thus an afront to nature, and is not to be tolerated
13.
by injb 2y ago
>> The minority argued that if you are exerting constant pressure backwards But that isn't how it works. The pressure on the trigger has to be varied for the gun to keep firing. She seems to think that keeping your finger in the
14.
by injb 2y ago
+1 the OP hasn't offered anything resembling evidence for their position anyway. It's worth noting that 3 of the supreme court justices who voted to lift this ban were appointed by the president who ordered the ban. Is this an exa
15.
by injb 2y ago
It's not on that basis that it was overturned though. It was overturned because the definition of machinegun requires that it fires more than one round with a single operation of the trigger. Everyone knows bump stocks don't do th
16.
by injb 2y ago
They probably selling the bottoms to someone else
17.
by injb 2y ago
At the risk of sounding like a smartass...AI? seriously its worth thinking about.
18.
by injb 2y ago
>> Ever think of how many more people would be willing to buy a table saw if they knew they weren't going to cut their fingers off? There is literally nothing stopping those people from buying the saw that prevents that right now
19.
by injb 2y ago
Whenever that kind if thing happens, a wizard did it.
20.
by injb 3y ago
I literally just had to shoot this exact idea down this sprint.
21.
by injb 3y ago
"on originality he just isn’t quite good enough." A bizarre way to judge someone who's supposed to be doing science, surely.
22.
by injb 3y ago
That's cool! I think it would be nice to show the actual % chance that the change seen is random when the slider is moved below the significant threshold. Is that possible?
23.
by injb 3y ago
I'm not much of a C programmer but my gut feeling on this is that is isn't ever going to be resolved by debating or reasoning of any kind. It'll be fixed when someone does something that makes some other language more relevan
24.
by injb 3y ago
That's a good question to think about actually. I don't think they handled it the way Russia is handling it now (assuming that this is in fact what's happening with Russia). Actually the big European powers gave up their empi
25.
by injb 3y ago
Yes it's true that the system is difficult to navigate, but that's a problem that only the lucky few have. The vast majority of people who would like to emigrate to the US aren't qualified anyway, so for them it's much s
26.
by injb 3y ago
>> Martha Stewart is an "outsider" and not an insider of drug company ImClone but she was found guilty of insider trading Minor correction: she was not convicted of insider trading. That charge was dismissed. She was only co
27.
by injb 3y ago
Tldr: she was arrested under a state statute that ended up getting overturned as unconstitutional. She sued but the court decided that the police acted in good faith and could not be expected to know that the law was unconstitutional, thus
28.
by injb 3y ago
Just ask someone from Wexford
29.
by injb 3y ago
I would be inclined not to. IMO GraphQL is great when you have a frontend team that wants to make changes without requiring a new backend build. If your team isn't structured that way (i.e. you have full stack devs and/or very fre
30.
by injb 3y ago
I can't shed any light on your question, but I can't help wondering - just out of curiosity - if it could be dangerous for the internet. Suppose there's some replicating worm from years ago on that machine that everyone has f

More ›