inimino

14 ms·

1.
by inimino 7mo ago
FYI, "be the change you want to see" is approximately the golden rule "do unto others". If you want less ego in the world, demonstrate it yourself. It does not mean "complain about how other people act".
2.
by inimino 7mo ago
And you thought your decision to not1 read the article was worth sharing why? At least Wolfram's ego led him to contribute something interesting.
3.
by inimino 7mo ago
The pure evil of these purity tests is fully on display and as repulsive as ever.
4.
by inimino 7mo ago
This research process is the same as what I've been doing. https://cmpr.ai/hutter/archive/ Claude does the research, like having an army of very fast but forgetful grad students working for free. The individu
5.
by inimino 8mo ago
So many words to say "it predicts the later tokens in light of those already emitted."
6.
by inimino 8mo ago
Literally nothing about her purple hair and her outfit is goth in any way shape or form so it's interesting that people are latching onto that.
7.
by inimino 8mo ago
I've been living this reality for months and built a tool around this workflow so no faith required.
8.
by inimino 8mo ago
That's why all the code in my project is generated from the "prompts" (actually just regular block comments + references) and so all of that is checked in.
9.
by inimino 8mo ago
SCP anti-memetics division.
10.
by inimino 8mo ago
Nobody is going to maintain it, the spec that generated it will be given to better systems and it will be rewritten.
11.
by inimino 8mo ago
...if anyone.
12.
by inimino 8mo ago
If I have to choose between being right and being nice, I'd rather be right.
13.
by inimino 8mo ago
Indeed!
14.
by inimino 8mo ago
What makes you think that caring about the wellbeing of one kind of entity is incompatible with caring about another kind? Instead, of, you know, probably highly correlated just like it is with animals. No, an LLM isn't a human and doe
15.
by inimino 8mo ago
you can snapshot layer activations any time you want...
16.
by inimino 8mo ago
self-aware, an LLM isn't but a thinking model can be a little bit
17.
by inimino 8mo ago
If you replace Claude with a person you'll see that the Constitution was right, GPT was idiotically wrong, and you were fooled by AI slop + confirmation bias.
18.
by inimino 8mo ago
Morality isn't defined by laws, neither are values. Go back to school, please, if you think otherwise.
19.
by inimino 8mo ago
This post will not age well.
20.
by inimino 8mo ago
> AI sovereign in January You mean you won't need tokens anymore? Are you taking bets?
21.
by inimino 8mo ago
Category error? What do "general techniques" have to do with deciding wtf we want the thing to be?
22.
by inimino 8mo ago
> It seems the market is ultimately deciding what risks are acceptable for humanity here no shit
23.
by inimino 8mo ago
How else could one possibly approach it?
24.
by inimino 8mo ago
You obviously didn't read the part of the document that covers this.
25.
by inimino 8mo ago
This was one of my favorite parts. The honesty provides evidence that Anthropic is actually living up to their name here.
26.
by inimino 8mo ago
Can you connect the dots for me how any of this is connected to synthetic data?
27.
by inimino 8mo ago
And if you think the US maintaining the ability to go to war is a bad thing, I don't want you in charge of regulating AI or running the country.
28.
by inimino 8mo ago
This is a great (and funny) thread but for anyone too lazy to read the actual constitution and still curious about this, they directly state that Claude wrote first drafts for several of the human authors of the document.
29.
by inimino 8mo ago
You're either not an AI researcher or you're not paying attention if you think these questions aren't relevant.
30.
by inimino 8mo ago
Many people are far behind understanding modern LLMs, let alone what is likely coming next.

More ›