infinite_spin

8 ms·

1.
Sanders proposes 20-year prison sentences for superintelligence AI developers(msn.com)
1 points by infinite_spin 2d ago|0 comments
2.
by infinite_spin 4d ago
Kind of related: https://www.forbes.com/sites/anishasircar/2026/09/01/federal... > Federal Judge Rules Pentagon’s AI Blacklist [of Anthropic] Violated The Constitution I don't see the common
3.
by infinite_spin 7d ago
https://archive.is/kH6U5
4.
by infinite_spin 11d ago
Some exploit hunters sell strictly to the grey/black market to avoid opsec issues. If you're selling on both, you're more likely to be identified by both.
5.
by infinite_spin 11d ago
I remarked upon distribution in a comment above > however I might violate their copyright by reconstructing that poem and then distributing it My argument is that the recording itself is not a copyright violation, not that distributing s
6.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
where I live, anything in public view is allowed to be filmed/recorded, which is how the news can record things on the street without getting a release from those that they filmed, and they certainly distribute those recordings
7.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
You expose your IP address even when not seeding, and I don't know if this person was seeding these torrents
8.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
I'm not a fan of joking about those efforts. The people doing that work to catch predators and prevent their evil from reaching the general public are heroes.
9.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
I don't follow your logic, VR headsets are fully capable of displaying 3D scenes. That's a solved problem.
10.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
I'm not a lawyer, but in my view copyright violations center around distribution, not necessarily the method by which a work is obtained e.g. if someone is reciting a poem they wrote in a public park, and I make a recording of that rec
11.
by infinite_spin 12d ago
I suspect their goal is to train a model for detecting adult material, so that they can block it, which isn't necessarily an amoral goal
12.
by infinite_spin 13d ago
Now I wonder if my agent(s) can detect when I'm coding drunk.
13.
by infinite_spin 13d ago
"Gather ye rosebuds while ye may" comes to mind
14.
by infinite_spin 13d ago
True, but you do get it under clear terms, for a duration that is both obvious and well established.
15.
by infinite_spin 13d ago
It's nothing like democracy though, and the concept of paying (or not paying) to vote is antithetical to a democratic process. We should not confuse the two.
16.
by infinite_spin 22d ago
it's possible your doctor is treating you for depression as well as ADHD
17.
by infinite_spin 23d ago
My advice: let these people think what they want, it reduces competition in an already saturated market
18.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
I'm content with my response.
19.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
- https://openai.com/index/introducing-the-codex-app/ no where does this document suggest that codex can "one shot everything to perfection with just a prompt". It describes using a prompt plus agent ski
20.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
Please stop dropping backhanded insults to other people here. It's not productive and violates guidelines.
21.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
That's like comparing a self driving car to a bicycle. One is clearly more intelligent than the other.
22.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
As pointed out in a previous comment of mine, it meets the definition of "intelligent", my last response is regarding the claim that I've been "fooled". Are we going in circles now?
23.
by infinite_spin 24d ago
And yet this "next-token predictor" is able to churn out well tested, valuable solutions, to complex problems. If you want to downplay that as nothing more than a fancy auto-complete, be my guest, I lose nothing from that.
24.
by infinite_spin 25d ago
> the ability to learn, understand, and make judgments or have opinions that are based on reason Agentic systems do this all the time. For example, I can point an agent at my codebase, and it will learn, understand, and make judgements b
25.
by infinite_spin 25d ago
You might want to consider the difference between "lying" and "hallucinations", wherein one is shown that the agent knew it was being inaccurate, yet chose an answer that achieved some goal set forth; and where hallucina
26.
by infinite_spin 25d ago
It's also a style that appears to deny the very first definition most dictionaries give for "intelligence" > the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.
27.
by infinite_spin 26d ago
The charges are the punishment. You are imprisoned, risk losing your career, risk losing reputation, and still have to hire a lawyer. The costs are incredibly asymmetric. This leads to the majority of people complying, which only emboldens
28.
by infinite_spin 26d ago
Not to sound like a contrarian, but no. They would have thrown it in a faraday bag, cloned the device, and then would use one of the many existing forensic tools available to crack the pin. https://cellebrite.com/en/blo
29.
by infinite_spin 26d ago
I feel like both viewpoints are valid ways of determining what you personally view as "good", and I don't want to take away from that diversity of opinion
30.
by infinite_spin 27d ago
Number of successful outcomes reported (e.g. with disabled students, cancer patients). Labor costs. Latency of services. Scientific discoveries found. Etc. I'm not trying to discount the qualitative approach, but I think it's not

More ›