inerte

5 ms·

1.
by inerte 7d ago
We can definitively punish bigger companies. The issue is the geopolitical positioning, and basically agreeing that we accept smaller companies in our country / society while another country might develop bigger companies, and in theor
2.
by inerte 7d ago
This is a good resource https://howborisusesclaudecode.com/ My best takeaway from the site was: Every time you see Claude Code / Codex doing something you don't want, ask it to add to AGENTS.md. Specially if they
3.
by inerte 8d ago
Also likely, devs took shortcuts to deliver fast. Now to make the button blue they need to differentiate primary buttons from others. Simple, right? But design guidelines prevent one offs, and no !important. So you create a CSS class, but y
4.
by inerte 8d ago
To be fair I’ve worked on human programmed systems where similar “it should be a half point story” requests would be met with snark by the engineers and take 2 sprints. I guess we are all PMs now.
5.
by inerte 8d ago
I was going to mention OP might be rediscovering https://beads.gascity.com/
6.
by inerte 13d ago
No, embargoed news is super common. Almost every single product announcement goes through that. Critics watch movies early, companies have access to LLM model improvements early, car manufacturers send production models early… it happens ev
7.
by inerte 25d ago
It depends on what software you’re building. The npm ecosystem is huge, hosting is easy, etc. Sure C can do it but it will take longer.
8.
by inerte 27d ago
It is until ARC-AGI-4. Maybe around 73 we will stop.
9.
by inerte 1mo ago
Gee, 100%. Articles basically saying genetics explain everything.
10.
by inerte 1mo ago
What's the methodology? Is Gemini actual gemini.google.com or mixed with google.com and Android searches?
11.
by inerte 1mo ago
No, it has happened to almost every other "sota" model before. There used to be a meme with a circular arrow going through Anthropic, OpenAI, Google as a hype circle. Now we can drop Google and add a couple of Chinese companies. I
12.
by inerte 1mo ago
I don't get what you mean? To me the biggest news is Jeff and Sanjay leaving Google... but then not really, since Google will be "an investor". I guess that's sorta their retirement plan? And is Discovery Loop actually p
13.
by inerte 1mo ago
Yes. Be locked in. It's better to go 100% and only pay the switch costs if you have to. Developing abstractions to let you switch technologies has 2 costs: The actual development, and not fully utilizing a specific technology. Lots of
14.
by inerte 1mo ago
Maybe LLMs can't, but another form of AI will. I hope nobody is interpreting this as "nothing will never be as good as us". I see similar thinking in stories of how humanity got here. Religion has thousands of years adapting
15.
by inerte 1mo ago
I’ve used Monica HQ a lot. I am building a similar tool but With AI (tm) https://meetemilia.com/ Currently struggling with actually giving it the personality you see on the website, or if it should be more of a tool. I hate
16.
by inerte 1mo ago
Back in the day "what happens when the user types a url in the address bar and press enter" used to be an interview question, and I remember nobody has ever mentioned the hardware and keyboard keys and interrupts. This post does!
17.
by inerte 2mo ago
Let's say you grab a can of Coke in the grocery store, shelf sticker says 49c. When you pass on the cash register, it clearly shows $5k in the cashier's monitor, and the point of sales screen, so you're charged $5k. Ooops, sa
18.
Artist sues AI meme generator for selling deeply personal comic as ad template(arstechnica.com)
4 points by inerte 2mo ago|1 comments
19.
by inerte 2mo ago
In the US the rich already has more public power than the poor... from lobbying to donations to "speech". I guess making it official would save them from all this work and simplify things?
20.
by inerte 2mo ago
Your language is not even sarcasm at this point, but was really used by Google a few years ago https://www.wxii12.com/article/google-home-confuses-users-wi... - "we were just surfacing timely content for our users
21.
by inerte 2mo ago
More likely they don’t care what the company does. Sell cars or muffins, it’s all the same thing you just tweak numbers in a spreadsheet.
22.
by inerte 2mo ago
To me the tools are newer, but fit people in a controlled context to sell clothing is as old as photography itself.
23.
by inerte 2mo ago
Related, Patrick H Willems did a long video about it and I recommend https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAtbFwzZp6Y
24.
by inerte 2mo ago
I've done a version of "world" for Sigil, a programming language I was kinda doing but stopped, also for agents. LLM generated article here https://inerte.github.io/sigil/articles/worlds-not-mocks&#x
25.
by inerte 2mo ago
I honestly interpreted and agreed with the version "this saves money".
26.
by inerte 3mo ago
I learned in Brazil. Here in the California I asked my son's kindergarten teacher if she would teach cursive, and she said they don't teach calligraphy and I've never seen it described this way, but she's right.
27.
by inerte 3mo ago
Reporting on percentage of AI generated lines of code is very different from total lines of code. Yes I know both of them are missing what's the value delivered, but the later assumes the value is the number of lines, while the former
28.
by inerte 4mo ago
I know it has the same functionality, but it also looks like the Codex app which looks like Cursor Agents! Are they sharing some VS Code primitive here?
29.
by inerte 4mo ago
Same for me. I applied for engineering manager. Was told it was going to be a code review. I found a bunch of things that it could be improved, detected a very slow part / quadratic loop, but couldn't come up with the best algo to
30.
by inerte 4mo ago
I am getting so confused when to use what... agents, sub-agents, tasks, team mates, /goal, /loop, and now workflow. Each with different degrees of effort. Don't make me think. All these knobs are also exposed in ChatGPT, whic

More ›