indubitably

11 ms·

1.
by indubitably 7y ago
How so?
2.
by indubitably 8y ago
Further efforts to bifurcate the browser market. Keep it classy, Google.
3.
by indubitably 8y ago
Helpful? It's just true.
4.
by indubitably 8y ago
Programmers are just self-important.
5.
by indubitably 9y ago
Well that’s depressing.
6.
by indubitably 9y ago
Perhaps it's nitpicking, but what benefit is it to not make the GraphQL language be valid JSON?
7.
by indubitably 9y ago
The standard is excellent, and has been rolled out much more effectively than previous standards (much more smoothly than flexbox, to cite a recent example). The women involved in this project kicked ass, and continue to do so. What's
8.
by indubitably 9y ago
It's also releveant that the author feels perfectly justified in making recourse to a hypothesis about history which far from easy to test: “The idea of genius elaborated during the Romantic Age (late 18th and 19th centuries) has done
9.
by indubitably 9y ago
It's not just dead people you're talking about, it's the families of those people. Keep in mind that in many cases the recordings of their ancestors are the only ones existing. It's not at all clear that a university or
10.
by indubitably 9y ago
There are whole subfields of language documentation, language revitalization, language reclamation, etc. There are conferences (ICLDC, Breath of Life, Language is Life just to mention three), journals ( http://nflrc.hawaii.edu&#x2
11.
by indubitably 9y ago
Because you want to be nice?
12.
by indubitably 9y ago
I don't understand why Python people aren't more intent on getting it into web browsers. Or are they?
13.
by indubitably 9y ago
Could mean almost anything but what generativist linguistics (or whatever the latest label for the Chomskyan school) does, which continues to promote the notion that language is essentially algebraic, that "grammaticality" is bina
14.
by indubitably 9y ago
I don't think so at all. Natural languages evolve with ambiguity built in — any sort of ambiguity is almost always an error in programming.
15.
by indubitably 9y ago
Could you explain what you mean by this?
16.
by indubitably 9y ago
unicorns all around
17.
by indubitably 10y ago
What's impossible about that? Many languages have complicated inflection patterns like that.
18.
by indubitably 10y ago
codingame has destroyed my productivity because it is awesome
19.
by indubitably 10y ago
Apparently nothing was ever more important than renewing the domain…
20.
by indubitably 10y ago
"But despite the sneers, I kept hammering a theme in speech after speech and conversation after conversation that went sort of like this: “Instead of scratching only your own itches, why not scratch your girlfriend’s itch?" Jesus.
21.
by indubitably 10y ago
Pretty rich coming from the complainer-in-chief of JS, the guy who advises not employing people who don't happen to agree with his personal take on how JS should be written.
22.
by indubitably 10y ago
But undefined is specific to Javascript… there are lots of other Javascript things that JSON doesn't handle either, like Set or Map objects. It's not intended to serialize arbibtrary JS objects — it's intended to serialize a
23.
by indubitably 10y ago
p { color: hsla(0, 0%, 0%, 0.8); }
24.
by indubitably 10y ago
> (There’s nothing wrong with this, by the way. You’re in the business of unemploying people. If you think that is unfair, go back to school and study something that doesn’t matter.) Good grief, what a lovely offhand comment that is.
25.
by indubitably 10y ago
Why would NK do that?
26.
by indubitably 10y ago
The internet.
27.
by indubitably 10y ago
Keep your personal quirks out of it Don’t personalize your work in ways that would require explanations. I like taking advantage of variables to compartmentalize logic.
28.
by indubitably 10y ago
This is totally off-topic, but man, Norvig writes some miserable HTML.
29.
by indubitably 10y ago
It's not just Edge users, I get the same constant annoyances with Firefox.
30.
by indubitably 10y ago
Are you in HR?

More ›