indosauros

15 ms·

1.
by indosauros 1y ago
What's going on is "we have 14 standards so we need to create a 15th" actually worked this time
2.
Tell HN: Microsoft.com added 192.168.1.1 to their DNS record
498 points by indosauros 3y ago|133 comments
3.
by indosauros 4y ago
FYI if you use Jetbrains/PyCharm, it also provides this (and has saved me many times) Just right click your file and view "Local History"
4.
I bought 1000 meters of wire to settle a physics debate [video](youtube.com)
434 points by indosauros 5y ago|229 comments
5.
by indosauros 6y ago
Yes, visiting the 2003 version in the Wayback Machine prompts to download a swf
6.
by indosauros 6y ago
Is there a version of this that is annotated? For example a few steps in are some niches on the wall -- I half expected a popup explaining their purpose
7.
by indosauros 7y ago
Here's a gif of the second issue from the blog post, just reproduced on my client https://i.imgur.com/X8FZJhi.gif
8.
by indosauros 8y ago
Any course UNSW has put up by Richard Buckland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpRRUQFbePU So much enthusiasm -- I wish I had teachers like him at school.
9.
by indosauros 8y ago
I do the exact same thing. I find WIP stash-per-branch very useful when I'm context switching often between feature branches. I've got two aliases set up for this -- `git wip` and `git popwip`: $ git config --global alias.wi
10.
by indosauros 8y ago
It seems to me this product is mainly targeted at 1) new customers, and 2) AE Flex customers wanting to switch to Standard. The third category (Existing 2.7 Standard customers wanting to just upgrade to 3.7 -- which is me unfortunately) are
11.
by indosauros 8y ago
> At this time, the original App Engine-only APIs are not available in Second Generation runtimes, including Python 3.7. This means that if you already have a significant app running on Appengine Standard, none of the built-in APIs are s
12.
by indosauros 9y ago
Discussion yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14711461
13.
by indosauros 10y ago
Also soon, Python: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/
14.
by indosauros 11y ago
It also matters whether you're using Python 2 or 3. This is one of the things they changed in 3: >>> print(0.1 + 0.2) 0.30000000000000004
15.
by indosauros 11y ago
>>> L(*stuff, 'a', 'b') SyntaxError: only named arguments may follow *expression >>> L(*stuff, *stuff) SyntaxError: invalid syntax
16.
by indosauros 12y ago
Not likely anymore: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2014/08/python-4000.h...