includenotfound

5 ms·

1.
by includenotfound 14h ago
> The entire premise is that real-world software is buggy and the LLM is much better at locating and exploiting those bugs than you are at preventing them If that was the premise, why run LLMs in a lesser sandbox than a VM? Clearly it&#x
2.
by includenotfound 19d ago
Extremely weak justification on their part, bordering on trolling. It's just marketing. Easy access to malicious information hasn't proven to be the disaster these anti-prophets proclaim. For the last ~3 decades of widespread inte
3.
by includenotfound 19d ago
Models are quite safe when they're useless, actually. In the times of GPT-3 I'd scoff at the idea of an LLM doing any hacking; today, I'm running several AIs on my code before publishing, and they are finding (and demonstrati
4.
by includenotfound 2mo ago
Sometimes your question was simply visually similar to another but conceptually very different, and it'd get closed for being a duplicate anyway. Then you have to re-ask it, now with a couple extra disclaimers spelling out that indeed
5.
by includenotfound 2mo ago
Perhaps not what you intended, but most of it is stored in various models' weights.
6.
by includenotfound 2mo ago
That's in fact also very technically feasible. They're already running small classifier models on both your inputs and your outputs. These models are said to be in place for safety, but they could answer 2 questions: (1) is this a
7.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I don't doubt the Swiss could do it right technically speaking, as they do everything else, but I guess the economic argument still holds.
8.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I find AI helps a lot with my context drift (or attention deficit). I can now simply burst type questions one after another in a large prompt, then have the AI do all the relevant searches / data collections, and spit them out quickly,
9.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
You left out the most interesting part - did you find any BTC?
10.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
Yeah, I mostly agree, except that I didn't come to Switzerland because it's next door, but because I was sick of working hard and making no money in my home country - and it was either Switzerland or the US. I had offers from both
11.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I do in fact. Germany: https://www.bka.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Publikationen/Pol... Total N = ~2.2M Germans = ~1.2M (~58%) Non-Germans = ~900k (~42%) Population: Germans ~71M (~85%), foreign ~12M (~15
12.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
That's what the propaganda would like to have you believe. The RU/UA war was entirely orchestrated by the US. The "Russia will invade the EU" propaganda was useful to scare the EU population, so they'd accept issuin
13.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/apr/10/super-rich-aba... The rest who are not chased are usually deeply intertwined with politicians, and are running corruption schemes along them. I'm not on
14.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
I recently got the Swiss passport but I'm still very much an immigrant. I am also a dual citizen, and frankly, hold not much love for this country. It's a secondary thing to me, the way having a nice car is: yeah it's nice, y
15.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
The point OP is making is that Switzerland undisputably has a very large proportion of immigrant population and that adding more should be carefully considered for various legitimate reasons, but it looks like you chose to be willfully igno
16.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
Spain is legalizing 500k immigrants: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/spain/spain-legalizing-half-mi... Not quite Berlin, but same effect: nearly indiscriminate influx of poorly vetted immigrants that can soon travel
17.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
Assume it's true for the sake of argument. Do you think that would be an issue then?
18.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
European politicians are subject to US's (and thus Trump's) orders. The "strong and deep statements" they release are cheap theater. The US is defending Europe through NATO. Until that changes, the EU will continue to be
19.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
Investing in the EU is like burning cash. Excessive regulation, high costs and taxes (especially of human labor), and investors get punished for creating and growing companies. Even if you overcome all of this and become successful, you&#x2
20.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
What is clear is that you strongly hold opinions that you're not willing to put money into, i.e. they're worthless (by your own account). Thank you for the clarification.
21.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
You: "How do you gauge the tone of the reply I was answering to?" Me: "here's why, you said this word and that word, carrying this and that connotation" You: "Notice how you ignored my question" lmao Anywa
22.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
You're clearly devaluating a group of people. "unsurprisingly": these people are predictable (by you, in this case) "his genius moves": hyperbole, you clearly think they are not You're saying people predictably
23.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
> Not much stops them from saying it's due to national security, when it's actually due to the guy in the chair having a fit of emotions Trying to discern the motive for something like this in a court is a losing game. The oppo
24.
by includenotfound 3mo ago
> People who look up to Donald Trump unsurprisingly feel his genius moves are hard to read I don't look up to Trump but this is phrased incredibly condescending of you. You are directly implying that people who like Trump are stupid
25.
by includenotfound 1y ago
It would be good to get a honest, objective, non ideological explanation somewhere - but almost any source I find is heavily biased. What's your take on that relationship?
26.
by includenotfound 1y ago
Indeed. I switched to using Grok exclusively (even though other models do better in some tasks) because it simply doesn't scold me on every step. For example, I tried looking up some CA legislation by asking Gemini about the bill'
27.
by includenotfound 1y ago
This is not a study but a news article. The study is here: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1211286109 A replication was attempted, and it found the exact opposite (with a bigger data set) of what the origina