inarru

5 ms·

1.
by inarru 15y ago
wsgi apps can be wrapped so that they can be called by wsgi-lite middleware. see the lighten() decorator.
2.
by inarru 15y ago
> I don't know if you realize this, but the author, P.J. Eby, is the same guy who wrote the original WSGI spec. yup (though to conclude anything from that fact is a clear fallacy). I've realised that what I actually disliked most was hi
3.
by inarru 15y ago
well, that's not quite all. if you're writing middleware you sometimes have to write a some (mostly reusable) extra code to pass as the start_response() to other wsgi callables. (to access the headers and/or munge anything sent by .write(
4.
by inarru 15y ago
the only benefit is not using start_response() before returning your data.
5.
by inarru 15y ago
is it just me or is this completely flawed as a response to armin's article? - Armin: "you can't replace the 'bad' bits of WSGI for asynchronous apps without using some python extension like greenlet" - to which this article replies: "Armin
6.
by inarru 15y ago
"And yes I'm the same idiot that sold a used wetsuit on eBay for £9,000." Ah, I remember this! http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160... very similar, but an ebay listing not a portfolio website. he certainly knows h
7.
by inarru 16y ago
If you spent 1% of the time you did writing this comment researching your misguided accusations you would realize that xcode 4 isn't free and downloadable for registered (free to register) Apple Developers.
8.
by inarru 16y ago
"for members of the developer program (which is a free membership)." no, it's only free for members of the paid developer program. free members who try and download it are given a link to the appstore or an option to purchase the yearly mem