Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
imoreno
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
imoreno
4mo ago
Don't Anthropic and OpenAI both offer the same thing built in? What are the difference with this service?
2.
▲
by
imoreno
4mo ago
>they do not want to pay a subscription. This is wrong in 2026. Lots of people want to pay. See: TFA What they don't want is and _still_ see ads, get hassled by needy marketing emails. See: TFA If you're saying "we're
3.
▲
by
imoreno
6mo ago
That's how it has to be. Volunteer community doesn't have the bandwidth to make everything maximally user friendly. Users have to do their share too, by accepting the responsibility to learn about their system. Otherwise the model
4.
▲
by
imoreno
8mo ago
There's a spectrum of writing, corresponding to supply/demand or push/pull. The article is giving advice for oversupplied writing, where the audience doesn't really want to hear you, and you're trying to badger it i
5.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
This was a very confusing article, full of filler. I couldn't stand to read the "detective story" style. Sounds like the technique is for high-dimensional ellipsoids. It relies on putting them on a grid, shrinking, then expan
6.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
>You can give a quick explanation in terms they understand, which makes your job sound easy and makes them wonder how anybody gets paid to do it. What is the problem with this? Most jobs, when simplified, sound like "anybody can do
7.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
If we assume 100 colonists on the ship, with 10 tons of mass per person, accelerating to 0.2c over 2 ly and then back down, the energy required is quite substantial. Multiple centuries of the total output of the whole planet.
8.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
With Alpha Centauri being only 4 light years away, interstellar travel seems almost feasible. But then you consider all the inconvenient details, and realize such a journey would have to take hundreds, maybe thousands or even more years on
9.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Usually, animals move around while digesting. They don't just eat the food, immediately digest it, and poop on the spot like a cartoon.
10.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
>Most of this carnivorous botany is small, but the diversity of different trapping mechanisms raises an evolutionary question. Isn't the obvious conclusion that: 1. There are many peaks in the fitness hypersurface for plants that co
11.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Wouldn't animal scavengers pick the carcass clean long before it rots?
12.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
RWD on an electric truck, lol. What a joke.
13.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
It seems performative. They remove a bunch of stuff nobody ever complained about, like paint or radio. Meanwhile it still has an app and it's still electric with pitiful range. The goal isn't to actually fix the car market, but pr
14.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
The most interesting point in this is that people don't/can't fully utilize LLMs. Not exposing the system prompt is a great example. Totally spot on. However the example (garry email) is terrible. If the email is so short, wh
15.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
It's not really YAGNI if you need it to debug, is it?
16.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Fascinating! Here's 4 prompts on gpt4 with same system prompt and everything: > With the assumption that you can dry two towels simultaneously in two hours, you would likely need another two-hour cycle to dry the additional two towe
17.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
LLMs currently have the "eager beaver" problem where they never push back on nonsense questions or stupid requirements. You ask them to build a flying submarine and by God they'll build one, dammit! They'd dutifully squa
18.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Yes let's not say what's wrong with the tech, otherwise someone might (gasp) fix it!
19.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
First of all, loyalty happens when both sides have moats. I'm not talking here about the case where one side is very loyal and the other is very disloyal - I'd rather call that "suckering". But in the US, government jobs
20.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
This focuses on case where the acquirer seeks to capture the value of the startup's business. But this is not always the case, sometimes the startup is dubious, but a cash-rich enterprise can purchase startups simply to eliminate poten
21.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
The main reason for me is that terminal programs are just less crappy, because people who develop them try much harder. The terminal itself strikes me as a terrible platform - no text sizes, no fonts, no graphics... People dismiss it as unn
22.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Probably harder to monetize traffic and upsell subscription extras. I agree, if it's all done on the client anyway, it should just be a local app.
23.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
I think the problem is the disconnect between learning vs passing. The goal of writing a book report is supposed to be to develop your brain and improve some skills. But society cannot simply give away knowledge without some kind of testing
24.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Luckily I use a much better *top, btop.
25.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Why would there be an NDA on atop? It's under GPL.
26.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Does anyone know something like this, but for other languages like Python?
27.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
Instead of koji, I use `aider --commit`
28.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
It's possible to mitigate this with a conservative system prompt.
29.
▲
by
imoreno
1y ago
You don't need to abandon "the Internet". Maybe we could improve on the TCP/IP stack or the ISP model but it's hardly a priority. What we need is to abandon the web and start a divergent platform. It's not your
30.
▲
by
imoreno
2y ago
>If it were freely downloadable and self-hostable by customers, then the company would be giving away its main value prop, and would only be able to generate revenue by, I dunno, acting as a hosting provider? Those margins are tiny and a
More ›