imilev

8 ms·

1.
by imilev 1mo ago
yes i think everyone is waiting to see that ;d, i've been on qwen for the last year and a half now.
2.
by imilev 1mo ago
Great article, I think the most important aspect from it is the auto-routing. As humans laziness is in our nature, so having to think if the model is capable enough is not something that most ppl will do - resulting in trying out smaller mo
3.
by imilev 1mo ago
Interested to dive deeper on the upfront design discussion. Have you found these to more often then not translate into the real product. In my experience at the begining of the full agentic coding loop in our company we were more hands on w
4.
by imilev 1mo ago
I hope that some of the executives out there will read the list. I know they won't spend the time to read the full blog, but at least the headers should be enough
5.
by imilev 2mo ago
I see, I misinterpret what you are saying. I think manually written code is thing of the past. There will be need for it from time to time but we are going to operate at an even higher abstraction than we do now. Same is for things like ase
6.
by imilev 2mo ago
I disagree tbh, the prototype is not the product not just because of technical abilities but also because of product expertese in a topic. If it was otherwise outsourcing companies would've dominated the market for a long time, but it
7.
by imilev 2mo ago
I think we have played this game long time ago. If products were a question of a single request then outsourcing companies would dominate over product ones. I think a lot of product development happens in the itearations after the intial pr
8.
by imilev 2mo ago
What happens when shit hits the fan in my exp is that I have to crack open the codebase and debug some portion of it, so I can explain it to myself in order to be able to explain what is wrong to the LLM. Otherwise what I have found is that
9.
by imilev 2mo ago
Cannot believe I needed a VPN to the US, to open this from Switzerland... At least give me the article ffs.
10.
by imilev 6mo ago
Everyone is looking through ClaudeCode's leak, I've been working on a better way to represent codebases to observe how my agents are working on them. Wanted to dive and see what ClaudeCode is all about, so visualized it. You can r
11.
by imilev 6mo ago
Awesome article, I feel a lot of people have also forgotten that good projects take iteration not 100 new features. To get few features to an excelent state it requires multilpe iterations at multiple stages. 1) The developer who does a tas
12.
by imilev 8mo ago
https://ivanmilev.pro
13.
by imilev 9mo ago
Really cool blog. I have been thinking about this recently as I was a center piece of our startup, and to me the hardest part of giving away responsibilities has been 2 phase: firstly that suddenly I feel like I am not in control, and secon
14.
Show HN: Building the Cursor UI selector but for back end(codeboarding.org)
2 points by imilev 11mo ago|0 comments
15.
by imilev 1y ago
I understand, so you would much rather count an active Issue more valueable then few stars. I am saying active as I have seen already issues being open and as soon as a comment on my side gets in the person has disappeared, I suppose people
16.
Ask HN: Is your Open-Source project's traction real or noise?
1 points by imilev 1y ago|2 comments
17.
by imilev 1y ago
So in order to keep the diagram up-to-date with commits we use the git difference of python files. An agent is tasked to firstly evaluate if the change is big enough to trigger a full clean analysis. If the change is not big enough we start
18.
Show HN: We create visual codebase maps that scale (static analysis and LLMs)(github.com)
6 points by imilev 1y ago|2 comments
19.
Show HN: ToolFuzz – Automated Testing for Agent Tools(github.com)
1 points by imilev 2y ago|0 comments