imaginaryNumb3r

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   I second Vivaldi. The people I know who tried it never went back.
2. 2.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   there's many other browsers which simply don't have their own engine. For my taste, Vivaldi is the best choice for power users.
3. 3.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   how is this not common sense
4. 4.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   This right here. Rust is a low-level language hat makes a whole dimension of implicit knowledge explicit. This is a very good thing, but if you are a programmer that is used to "copy paste, and then it works". You will have a very
5. 5.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   thanks a lot, that makes much more sense now! I'm just so used to "rage culture" and uninformed complaining that I tend to overreact.
6. 6.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   I did read the beginning of the article and I wasn't too impressed. So I went through the comments, looking for bits of wisdom that might hint reading the whole article was worth it. Still, I wasn't impressed.
7. 7.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   The problem is that content-creation has become prohibitively laborious and expensive. Don't even think about creating a Battlefield level (or similar levels) without having a team of people working on it. 3D models aren't much b
8. 8.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   Reading all of it is a big ask for a blog post that is this long
9. 9.▲
   by imaginaryNumb3r 4y ago

   > I'm not sure where they got that idea from. Maybe they've been reading propaganda. Maybe they fell prey to some confident asshole, and convinced themselves that Rust was the answer to their problems. That's a very strong