idrdex

6 ms·

1.
Constitutional AI is not a constitution(hadleylab.org)
3 points by idrdex 5mo ago|1 comments
2.
by idrdex 5mo ago
The framing is off. AI is a tool that can operate as a human. GOV is how the humans are organized. AI can basically scale GOV. That’s the paradigm shift. Provenance is durable. AI is just the first opportunity we have had to make it scalea
3.
by idrdex 5mo ago
Fair challenge. The contracts are open on a governed ledger (git) — versioned, diffable, auditable by anyone who cares to look. Every constraint, every change, every build output has a commit hash. No hidden prompts. But here's the rea
4.
by idrdex 5mo ago
Great question — it's the right one to ask. There is no "governance prompt." The system uses versioned contracts (markdown files with explicit constraints), not system prompts. Every contract is in git — auditable, diffable,
5.
Fixed-point theorems as a model for recursive governance(hadleylab.org)
1 points by idrdex 5mo ago|0 comments
6.
by idrdex 5mo ago
I'm the guest on this episode. MD/PhD (Penn), spent 14 years building clinical AI — from $38M in NIH-funded work at UCSF to a governance compiler that now runs breast cancer navigation (mammochat.ai), Caribbean cancer care (caribc
7.
Dexter Hadley on building governed AI for healthcare – Achieve Podcast [video](youtube.com)
1 points by idrdex 5mo ago|6 comments
8.
Stop Prompting, Start Governing – Why healthcare AI needs contracts, not prompts(hadleylab.org)
1 points by idrdex 6mo ago|0 comments
9.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Testing
10.
by idrdex 6mo ago
That’s exactly what I’m getting at. LLMs have abstracted computation itself. In fact LLMs are a step back from computation. They are in essence a state machine. A prompt goes in and a response comes out. CANONIC is a language to extend that
11.
by idrdex 6mo ago
The only thing missing from the system is the AI GOV that defines the specification of work. Once that is commonplace developers become ephemeral as the code to support the hardened GOV. That is what CANONIC.org is.
12.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Let the LLM write the software. That’s ephemeral and evolves with time. Humans should govern the entire system to resilience. That is fixed with time. Thou shalt not kill has staying power. Weapons, poison, and other methods of death evolve
13.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Indeed it’s both. Once humans start governing their AI. Once the blockchain community can check the GOV contract for validity. Founder of One becomes a reality. Contracts are institutional memory!
14.
by idrdex 6mo ago
AI editing? It is completely governed by AI. I thought that was obvious. What’s the problem?
15.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Indeed. CLAUDE.md is a linear memory for agents. Hardly the structure for multi orchestration requires for agenetic programming today. CANONIC is a learning language to customize agents across your governance tree. Ever internal node is an
16.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Oh boy is right. If BITCOIN is SPECulation to distribute cryptographic transactions on a blockchain pre AI, CANONIC is a SPECification to distribute WORK contracts with your AI on a blockchain. So BITCOIN=SPECulation. While CANONIC COIN=SPE
17.
by idrdex 6mo ago
This is partially true. Thanks for the comment. I’m the developer of CANONIC. It’s an AI GOV framework. But crypto it is not. The opposite. CANONIC is a learning language to fully govern AI. Ask yourself why you are still programming comput
18.
by idrdex 6mo ago
Author here. The blog argues that the real story from Anthropic's hackathon isn't that domain experts can build AI (they can) but that hackathon demos and production systems require fundamentally different things. A permit app tha
19.
A lawyer won Anthropic's hackathon – what everyone missed(hadleylab.org)
30 points by idrdex 6mo ago|23 comments