idispatch

8 ms·

1.
by idispatch 1y ago
I counted the word “sound” in this reply 8 times. When I the word sound there is always the word Rust nearby. It is just a coincidence, of course.
2.
by idispatch 1y ago
On that angle - I like the project structure, overall, CMake use and documentation. It was helpful to understand, high level, before diving into code. I also recall the discussion here related to fast associative containers, like unordered
3.
by idispatch 1y ago
Related video for those who are interested: “When Nanoseconds Matter: Ultrafast Trading Systems in C++ - David Gross - CppCon 2024” https://youtu.be/sX2nF1fW7kI?si=komqKuZ0-eOH2v4V This is basics for those who start creatin
4.
by idispatch 1y ago
Classic masterpiece, for those who experienced it in 1990s and wanted to know how it was done: https://github.com/mtuomi/SecondReality
5.
by idispatch 1y ago
Sooner or later there will inevitably appear a new language, or an evolution of the current Rust, which will be significantly better than Rust and not just a minor tweak to the language we know today . Let’s say it is named Rust++ (any res
6.
by idispatch 2y ago
It looks like you professionally sold 30 years of your life for money with no fun. You could have done something for fun all this time, and got payed for it, too. Much better that way.
7.
by idispatch 3y ago
And VSCode will still be around.
8.
by idispatch 3y ago
Looks like a unipost in a uniblog
9.
by idispatch 3y ago
This is plainly not true
10.
by idispatch 3y ago
To be more precise, to e.
11.
by idispatch 4y ago
Mind you, before this goes to prod please add error handling and logging. What happens when bar fails? What about baz? Now, please rewrite this so your team mates can maintain and extend. Yawn, I’ll wait for the PR.
12.
by idispatch 5y ago
OTOH, if it wasn't that good we would be using something else, good and better that win3.1 and the history would erase Windows.