idibidiart

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   And SEC goes after shady figures, not Goldman
2. 2.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   Ok, look, it's a pyramid scheme no different than the stock market.... coke heads at Goldman love this sh_t
3. 3.▲
   Poor Man's Algebraic Effects in JS(gist.github.com)

   3 points by idibidiart 9y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   Coinbase.Gov
5. 5.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   "We" is "we who get others onboard"? No point in being a pessimist.
6. 6.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   If they start losing money they will have a much stronger motivation to act. I feel like they say they are for it but they are not spending considerable resources (they should be) to stand up to the FCC.
7. 7.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   If we stage a nation-wide boycot of Amazon, Walmart.com, and a few other big retailers (and stop using Google, Bing et al) I can almost guarantee it that they will move mountains to bring back net neutrality. You have to get the big corpora
8. 8.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   The regulatory process is not scalable relative to the rate of technology driven disruption. It cannot scale. It can either fall behind or adapt to change, IMO.
9. 9.▲
   by idibidiart 9y ago

   I think the rate of technological change will force the SEC regulatory system to adopt an RFC process open to the public (bypassing Congress), similar to IETF, and I think Direct Democracy is an inevitable outcome of such disruption.
10. 10.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Is this just legalized gambling?
11. 11.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    How does the performance of WASM compare to JIT'd JS code?
12. 12.▲
    Bringing Web's Responsive Design to React Native(youtube.com)

    1 points by idibidiart 9y ago|0 comments
13. 13.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Any links to instructions for Reason WASM targeting?
14. 14.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Here to all the folks who are A) not legal scholars but pretending to be from their mom's basement and B) unable to reason about the implications but still assert their opinions, there are a ton of references to this issue. Here is one
15. 15.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Get informed. Don't talk out of your ass\: https://www.coindesk.com/eroding-net-neutrality-hurt-bitcoin...
16. 16.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    ISPs can block all P2P traffic (bits flowing between residential IPs) and removal of Net Neutrality regulations will embolden them to do so, but it's also about the trend toward ISPs being giving the green light to do whatever they wan
17. 17.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Last mile includes my last mile and your last mile and cannot see why blocking P2P traffic would not be part of the definition of last mile. Each user would be limited to a set of approved centralized services. No user to user routing. Only
18. 18.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Going with your "source/destination" definition, one Bitcoin/Signal user is source and the other is destination. They can require traffic to be exclusively between user and approved service provider, can't they?
19. 19.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    I meant legally they can't. They'd be sued and defeated in court. But not if Net Neutrality rules are undone.
20. 20.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just blocking a certain port. ISPs can identify and block all P2P
21. 21.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Also like I said removal of net neutrality regulations means ISPs esp big ones can kill Bitcoin by blocking the default port used by the Bitcoin client and ISPs can more than just blocking a certain port. ISPs can identify and block all P2P
22. 22.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Amazed that no one can see that Net Neutrality going away could very well mean the death of Bitcoin. Block the port and/or type of traffic -/ or even easier: eliminate P2P: everything must go thru a centralized service.
23. 23.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    It should align, and I'm surprised it doesn't seem to be aligned, or they see it as an opportunity to be an ISP themselves.
24. 24.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    I don't buy that it isn't be there problem. The UX will be broke. What good is a search engine if I can't get anywhere. Just because you're sure of your opinion, it doesn't mean it's correct Yet you assert ...
25. 25.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Their biggest and most lucrative service is search. What if I click a link in google's search result and my ISP refuses to take me there? Or does it work differently?
26. 26.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Why isn't Google fighting this? They have a backup plan?
27. 27.▲
    Bringing the Web's Responsive Design to React Native(github.com)

    3 points by idibidiart 9y ago|0 comments
28. 28.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Start communities that use solar/wind energy, grow their own food (maybe using this in urban areas: https://www.media.mit.edu/groups/open-agriculture-openag/ove... ), use WiFi mesh networking, maybe launch the
29. 29.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    Money.
30. 30.▲
    by idibidiart 9y ago

    First time I hear he had a sister who is also a scientist. I've not read any of his books or seen any of his lectures but I've heard plenty about his work and insights, just nothing about his sister, who is also a brilliant mind..