iceflow19

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by iceflow19 11y ago

   It will still run on a 64-bit machine just fine though.
2. 2.▲
   by iceflow19 11y ago

   Red is not compatible with Rebol3, due in part to the fact that development on Red started before Rebol3 was open-sourced. The binaries for Rebol3 at the time were too unstable, so the older and much more solid Rebol2 was chosen. There is
3. 3.▲
   by iceflow19 11y ago

   The irony is that some core concepts in Rebol have been borrowed into the mainstream, the trouble being that people just don't realize it. Rebol was a major influence on JSON. Crockford used to be active in the community, and had rea
4. 4.▲
   by iceflow19 11y ago

   The syntax is minimalist for a reason. The primary paradigm of languages in the Rebol family (like Red) is language-oriented programming of which creating domain specific languages in an important factor. The more minimalist the base synt
5. 5.▲
   by iceflow19 11y ago

   The compilers for Red and Red/System are written in Rebol2. The binary distribution is just an encapsulated Rebol interpreter with source code. Rebol2 needs the 32-bit supporting libraries.