icedrop

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by icedrop 10mo ago

   Can you explain what you mean, in more direct or simpler terms?
2. 2.▲
   by icedrop 11mo ago

   This is phenomenal advice. The post itself strikes me as either lifted directly from reddit (experienceddevs or another sub), but your advice is generally great for any reader curious about how to handle this type of problem employee. From
3. 3.▲
   by icedrop 11mo ago

   one of many things, but agreed
4. 4.▲
   by icedrop 11mo ago

   Maintain a good agents.md with notes on code grammar/structure/architecture conventions your org uses, then for each problem, prompt it step-by-step as if you were a junior engineer's monologue. e.g. as I am dropped into a ne
5. 5.▲
   by icedrop 1y ago

   Tell us more, where can I find this person?
6. 6.▲
   by icedrop 1y ago

   Are images loading for anyone else? Seem broken for me.
7. 7.▲
   by icedrop 1y ago

   Not really. Sounds more like “core engineering” is used as a separate term, similar to infra engineering vs product engineering
8. 8.▲
   by icedrop 1y ago

   Is it legal to dilute this to zero? Can't you sue post-exit (e.g. Saverin and Facebook)?
9. 9.▲
   by icedrop 1y ago

   I think you bring up an interesting tangential point that I might agree with--that the people doing the misalignment are how architecture astronauts remain employed. But the core of Joel Spolsky's three posts on Architecture Astronauts