iainctduncan

7 ms·

1.
by iainctduncan 4d ago
Especially if you're not a pianist. I play a monophonic instrument, so even though I did plenty of piano, it sure it wasn't up to "casually sightreading examples from the literature" level.
2.
by iainctduncan 4d ago
I wouldn't even call this "humans planning poorly", I'd call it "humans pretending to plan poorly for publicity". Weasels gonna weasel.
3.
by iainctduncan 5d ago
It has embedded youtube videos of examples. I certainly didn't have that in my 20th century theory text books and it would have been very helpful! This resource looks excellent
4.
by iainctduncan 10d ago
I guess we disagree on whether that should change anything.
5.
by iainctduncan 10d ago
In the all the textbooks I have or have seen, those are called "acoustics" (and more specifically "tuning and temperament"). They are covered in the text book I had for acoustics, and not covered in any of the textbooks
6.
by iainctduncan 10d ago
It seems you arguing how things should be, not what they are . I don't disagree that in music we have lots of inconsistent nomenclature that could have better names. But writing an intro to a topic and using non-standard nomenclat
7.
by iainctduncan 10d ago
Sure, but none of that changes the fact that is someone reads that article and says "wow I like music theory!" and orders the best theory books or signs up for a course or lessons, they are going to be PISSED. They will get some b
8.
by iainctduncan 10d ago
"Music theory" has a near universally accepted meaning. This article is not about that, it's about what we all call in music academia acoustics and digital synthesis (which of course I know you know as I know your work). The
9.
by iainctduncan 11d ago
This is not an article about music theory, it's an introduction to what is called "acoustics" in educated music circles, along with examples from digital synthesis. It's a decent enough intro to acoustics and digital syn
10.
by iainctduncan 11d ago
PhD Candidate in music and computer science and gigging jazz musicain here. It is not too harsh. Articles like this confuse people who interested in learning a topic more than they help. Yet another case of programmers thinking "I&#x27
11.
by iainctduncan 11d ago
Our clients do indeed see multi-cloud as a nice-to-have, but it costs so much more to do, and the big clouds are so trusted, that it's rare that I see it. On the other hand, nobody trusts the big AI companies not to pull shenanigans or
12.
by iainctduncan 12d ago
The thing is, for big companies (or even small ones owned by PE, which is MOST of them), it's not just about cost. The big thing is risk . In my experience as a tech diligence assessor for PE firms for the last 7 years, investors real
13.
by iainctduncan 24d ago
uh no...it's not gatekeeping... because it's an article of advice from a professional to students . That's called teaching . Having people who know how to do something well tell you how to get better at – even by doing
14.
by iainctduncan 25d ago
you mean, because of the em dashes? Five years ago I was happil using them without having to worry about this bullshit. sigh
15.
by iainctduncan 25d ago
The article is about writers , not regular people. It's explicitly directed at people trying to make a living writing. We found it because of HN, but his audience - the only one's who's opinion he should give a shit about
16.
by iainctduncan 25d ago
You are quoting him out of context. That was directed at wannabe-writers who don't make time to read . Which is completely fucking batshit crazy. If anyone deserves some f-bombs, it's them. Additionally, the very next sentence is
17.
by iainctduncan 25d ago
If you like those, a less well knowned Scheme you will likely really like is s7. :-)
18.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
Racket is made by academics. Academics piss on each other a lot, it's unfortanately part of the culture and has (historically) been rewarded in the system (I am a PhD candidate, FWIW, and so have many, many friends "in the system&
19.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
:-)
20.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
Oh wait, there it is, sitting over top of the fat part and under the cork...
21.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
I am so dying to read more about the new/current/real bottleneck! Where is the bottleneck? WHERE?? Tell me! No evidence needed, just lay it on, man to man, thought-leader to thought-leader!
22.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
This is the germane point here. I'm not into LLM coding myself, but was talking about just this with my CS PhD supervisor yesterday, and porting language implementations is basically a perfect use case for them. He's been using th
23.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
Congrats, this is awesome! I have followed your writing and have your book, so was excited to see this was you. I have one question, can one drop into Scheme the way one can call Java in clojure, or is one totally firewalled from the underl
24.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
Well no shit, but that doesn't mean you just trust them just because they say it works. The cost of a false accusation can be very high.
25.
by iainctduncan 1mo ago
Are you serious? Pangram is notorios for false positives!
26.
by iainctduncan 2mo ago
You know those HN posts where someone who barely knows how to program decides to tell you why language X is terribly designed? This is that. Anyone with a decent understanding of music and acoustics can tell it's silly from the title a
27.
by iainctduncan 2mo ago
Wow, what an idiotic retitling. I guess they figure it's better clickbait. Makes the actually thoughtful and interesting article sound like it will be stupid.
28.
by iainctduncan 2mo ago
Do the masters. None of us know what the hell is going to happen with coding as a job right now, but a graduate degree carries weight well outside its narrow area. If coding goes to complete shit and you're in or done school, you'
29.
by iainctduncan 2mo ago
Many aspiring writers (perhaps most?) love the idea of having written, not so much the work of actually writing.
30.
by iainctduncan 2mo ago
I think we are going to see a lot of programmers quitting the biz in the next couple of years. Everyone talks about the increased pressure, stress, and monotony of grinding with LLMs, and individual coders aren't seeing the benefit .

More ›