i__believe

6 ms·

1.
by i__believe 10y ago
This is how I prefer it. Give me the lay of the land, if you will, then I can dive into what is interesting.
2.
by i__believe 10y ago
Hire too many expensive engineers?
3.
by i__believe 10y ago
I don't think that's why people buy consumer reports. At least for me it's about getting a professional review in the context of the product as well as against others in the same category from a source whose only interest is
4.
by i__believe 10y ago
Question: how does one go about finding that number?
5.
by i__believe 10y ago
One thing you may consider is having private or invite only communities. Almost all the offerings out there are for public communities, which leaves in house self help an untapped market.
6.
by i__believe 10y ago
Slack doesn't, unless I'm not finding that feature after a year+ of using it.
7.
by i__believe 10y ago
So they don't waste cycles on something not part of their core business or competency? Pretty standard reasons to pay someone to solve a problem. I think what this really showed is Dyn was not as competent in mitigating as what people
8.
by i__believe 10y ago
It's been really great, and reporting issues and small pull requests has been super easy so far. Not really what I expected from a company like walmart so I was pleasantly surprised. The only fundamental disagreement I have with it is
9.
by i__believe 10y ago
Have you looked into electrode.io? It's the total package with testing, server side rendering, optional above-the-fold rendering, profiling, etc. It took about half a day to get used to it, but I enjoyed not having to make the decision
10.
by i__believe 10y ago
I use it as a news site as well, and to resolve customer support issues. On that topic, it's simply amazing how much more responsive a company is if you contact them about a an issue on twitter than in any other form of communication.
11.
by i__believe 10y ago
I'm pretty sure that's a good illustration of my point.
12.
by i__believe 10y ago
Great signal for what?
13.
by i__believe 10y ago
Exactly, and this is a big problem where I work. I believe code should be readable, even by those with only cursory knowledge of the language. Object shortcuts is also a problem I think. For example, I had a method like this: const getObj =
14.
by i__believe 10y ago
Often times I see this argument made, and on it's face seems like a good one. However, experience has proven that it is difficult to actually contribute--even in active repo like npm. Every project has there own standards and unwritten
15.
by i__believe 10y ago
Why would I want to use different services? I (personally) use godaddy, my company uses namecheap. Both seem to be doing fine and we check in on them once a year.
16.
by i__believe 10y ago
I've received these as well, but it's always been "Hey, it's been 6 months since your last oil change with us -- come on in!" I could very easily see if you go to the same mechanic and they input your mileage betwee
17.
by i__believe 10y ago
I think there are a lot of nuance to this statement. After a few years on the start up scene, I believe that if you are using a "duck" typed language your core concepts should be tested without exception (for example rails and dja