hyperswine

7 ms·

1.
by hyperswine 2y ago
wow, thats really amazing. Are you a hardware engineer?
2.
by hyperswine 2y ago
One hell of a social engineering attack
3.
by hyperswine 3y ago
Will be missed.
4.
by hyperswine 3y ago
do you happen to know any?
5.
Ask HN: Anything done with hardware-software codesign?
2 points by hyperswine 3y ago|3 comments
6.
by hyperswine 3y ago
systems programming and HDL are quite enlightening, though bordering EE. Really gets deep into how computers work and what they really are, so you are not just dealing with a compiler black box on a high level language. Being able to unders
7.
by hyperswine 4y ago
StandardML or maybe OCaml
8.
by hyperswine 4y ago
A functional society
9.
Ask HN: What are we all missing?
1 points by hyperswine 4y ago|2 comments
10.
Ask HN: What part of the computing hierarchy can be most improved?
1 points by hyperswine 4y ago|1 comments
11.
by hyperswine 4y ago
why google if the docs are great and the lang server/IDE actually shows good docs + examples on hover
12.
by hyperswine 4y ago
absolutely
13.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Ruby is quite perfect for simpler, web based kinds of things from my experience. BUt one thing that always puts me off is that `start, do, end` syntax
14.
by hyperswine 4y ago
A bunch of them already show up in languages like rust. Generics are the more ergnomic impl of HKTs and with ownership after you pass an entity it off to another context, you cant use it again, which I guess isnt exactly linear per se
15.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Having the "same syntax but in multiple different contexts" is a good idea in general I feel
16.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Ooh this is something Ive been pondering too. Perhaps a transformer model like GPT but focused primarily on language semantics and such. Especially the point about cognitive load - which I find to be quite undersaid
17.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Hm, Im hearing a lot about REPL and GC
18.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Interesting
19.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Id be fine with delphi if their IDE was available on other systems like linux or mac. I also kinda find fpc a bit verbose and clunky. Something like an elm interface would make sense I think + the points you laid out
20.
by hyperswine 4y ago
I guess you could use arr.for_each() or arr.map()
21.
by hyperswine 4y ago
What specifically about JS do you think you are attracted to most? Maybe the clean syntax and dynamic typing? npm?
22.
by hyperswine 4y ago
I kinda just like using the default os shell with simple cargo run/test/etc. I want to understand why REPL is more and more used, in langs like julia, elixir, etc. Do you guys find it more conveninent or something? I do like elixi
23.
by hyperswine 4y ago
really? Thats the complete opposite of my vision
24.
by hyperswine 4y ago
lol
25.
by hyperswine 4y ago
What kinds of exotic syntax, Lifetime annotations and parameterising impl Trait like in returns? Also thoughts on carbon?
26.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Why not just use elm?
27.
by hyperswine 4y ago
A lot of langs have a std lib namespace (c++, rust for example) where you could just do `use std::fs::*` and write `read_to_string(path)`. Even better if those convienience functions were placed in `std::prelude` so that it would be immedia
28.
by hyperswine 4y ago
I personally hate lisp syntax, maybe im just no used to it or something but the (brackets (and (stuff))) feels a bit weird. Is there a reason why you want lisp syntax specifically?
29.
by hyperswine 4y ago
Can you elaborate on the no higher order functions, and the no modules but namespaces part?
30.
by hyperswine 4y ago
An actual functional lang server that doesnt randomly die on you and tries its best to infer your intent would be nice. I like that last point too, as copilot I think is going in the right direction with "step 1" of full optimisat

More ›