Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hungie
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Love these weird little guys.
2.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Nuclear waste leaking into the groundwater? Sure, if someone is being absurdly callous. But if we're going to invent a villain with no morals as just dumps the stuff then we might as well do the same for any other form of energy. I pre
3.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
If, and only if, you store it stupidly. There's plenty of ways to safely store it for millennia. It's not a truly difficult problem. And I'm just doing my best to present the facts as they are -- no fud.
4.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
It's also minuscule. A US person would generate roughly a chicken egg worth of waste across their entire lifetime.
5.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
How much nuclear waste would be generated, across 100 years of American levels of energy use, per person? I'll save you the effort, it's about one chicken egg, maybe as large as a tea cup. For your whole life, all the energy you&#
6.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
He's complied with Indian and Turkish authorities, choosing to censor. I'm sure he'd comply if asked by the trump admin and fight if asked by the Harris admin.
7.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Trans people having sex is not an act of depravity, lol. Trans people are people, and deserve sex just as much as anyone else. Cuck porn is extremely not my thing, but strikes me as a pretty tame fetish if all parties consent. Playing with
8.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
My gut feeling is that people joining the army is a whole lot more destructive than people doing sex work. Especially on only fans or whatever.
9.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Your words, I didn't say those things.
10.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
It can only be used against you if people think it can be used against you. Like, imagine a world where we said, " you flipped burgers in college? Eww gross, you've robbed your life!" It sounds absurd because we've colle
11.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Pot; kettle, etc.
12.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
If we connected, why not? I guess I'd make sure we both had clean sti panels before engaging in sex, but I'd do that with any partner. "They used their dick or vagina to make money" is not any different to me than "
13.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
That's fine for you (though I'd challenge you to ask yourself why), but younger generations and many in older generations like myself are realizing that sex work is just work. Bodies are just bodies. Relationships and past sexual
14.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
This framing, "sell their dignity", is your moral judgement (coming from your cultural, religious, or some other) background. I don't see it as any less dignified than any other work. You sell your labor to someone who pays y
15.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
I was intending to address both. I believe it's absolutely possible to consume too much porn, but it's by and large fine.
16.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Porn is fine. Sex has been a part of our social fabric for longer than we've been human. Obviously, there exists a lot of exploitation in porn, but performers who enjoy doing it and can support themselves with it on a platform like of?
17.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
I don't think you understand who made the max and why it failed.
18.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
The labor involved is highly skilled, and has seen extensive underpayment. When Boeing tried to ship manufacturing away from union shops, the quality and reliability of the planes plummeted, driving up costs for the company. As a frequent f
19.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Good. Jim McNerney absolutely shredded the culture, and eroded decades of good will. It's far past time workers for Boeing pressed for things to go back to being an engineering and manufacturing led company. Striking is one way to get
20.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
FDA with a reasonable bar - demonstrate that this is equivalent to a professional fitting. I'll take any opportunities for assistive technology to be a cheaper option.
21.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
They sure are forced to work. I don't know of a way to survive without working.
22.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
The New York Times has a bunch of media visualizations that are often quite dynamic. Building those requires engineering and ux time. Then, ensuring they play well with their custom page layouts takes time. I'm not talking about embedd
23.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
They are producing value for the NYT, but only being paid a fraction of that value. Labor is entitled to all the value it creates.
24.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
Sauron was a villain not because he loved evil, but because he loved efficiency above all other things. Learning that efficiency comes with a cost, and sometimes that cost is our humanity, was a hard lesson for me to learn. We always need t
25.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
I'm sorry, you are simply incorrect here. Some members of the Democratic Party are left of center, but by and large they are a center/center right party. They broadly support capitalism, broadly support imperial military power, br
26.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
It's almost certainly illegal, but it benefits the capital class, so it's going to get a pass for a long time. That said, it's exactly the same thing that landlords were doing with that pricing software and the government is
27.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
I'm sorry, I come from an English speaking part of the world that uses swear words quite differently. (As is very common in pidgin English variants.) The parents post was objectively sexist, and objectively highly sexist. Calling tha
28.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
High paid workers are still workers and deserve worker solidarity. We have more in common with them than either of us have with owners and execs. And agree with you along every one of those (except police, who are tasked with protecting cap
29.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
If you want the Union's opinion, their strike demands are the place to look. If you want my opinion, what you've described would be a start. Or at least the workers there should be parties to a decision on whether that's the
30.
▲
by
hungie
2y ago
And yet, downvotes. I feel like it's pretty objective that NYT isn't leftist in any meaningful way.
More ›