htobc

5 ms·

1.
by htobc 5mo ago
I have tried to make it clear in my posts that I like and use C++. This is not a language flame war, it's criticism of a feature's implementation. I did not say anyone using this is a moron, I said I believed a commit exercising t
2.
by htobc 5mo ago
Okay so why not _discuss that_. You're N posts deep in a thread where I've been actively trying since the start to pull this away from a language flame-war, (and acknowledge your bizarrely anti social style of interaction) while a
3.
by htobc 5mo ago
And then it turns out after ignoring any attempts to actually engage in the technical merits of how constexpr is done in C++, you made it 25 minutes into the 1 hour video, past all the obvious jokes from the presenter about how absurd it is
4.
by htobc 5mo ago
Hey buddy, maybe not liking something is not the same thing as not understanding it? Maybe saying, "this specific feature is bad" is not a generalization to the entire language? Maybe niche corner cases are evidence of poorly chos
5.
by htobc 5mo ago
Rather than engage in an unrelated language-war flame bait, why not actually discuss this particular issue with C++? Yes having a language built around zero cost abstractions for low level programming is a must, but how does that end up jus
6.
by htobc 6mo ago
That's pretty much how Google does dev, though not everyone there is consistent about small CLs or the <24 hour SLO for code review. But yeah, if the team lead is aware of what everyone is working on, and prioritizes fast CLs review