htnthrow11220

6 ms·

1.
by htnthrow11220 5mo ago
Sure. I took it as I think you intended - a statement of your understanding. I guess I just was irritated in, the moment as people are constantly reacting to unverified assumptions when there are many real things to react to. Apologies if I
2.
by htnthrow11220 5mo ago
Complete assumption on your part.
3.
by htnthrow11220 6mo ago
I see it all the time in basically every form of text communication. What makes you think you are not seeing it?
4.
by htnthrow11220 6mo ago
Even a small % of incorrectness quickly produces compounding effects, if you view LLMs as an information source. True or false statements are made with equal confidence, because the LLM can’t distinguish true from false.
5.
by htnthrow11220 7mo ago
To be fair, if all you need is to add elements to a child you don’t need React. Maybe nobody needs React, I’m not a fan. But a trivial stateless injection of DOM content is no argument at all.
6.
by htnthrow11220 7mo ago
They said each time they want something to be easier, not each time they do something. And they didn’t mention it has to be one-shot. You might have read too quickly and you’ve responded to something that didn’t actually exist.
7.
by htnthrow11220 7mo ago
Are you an LLM yourself?
8.
by htnthrow11220 7mo ago
It’s good to keep your skepticism but at some point you have to be able to recognize normal human usage of these conventions. And as we all read more AI content and talk to chatbots, that will influence how we do our own writing as well, hu
9.
by htnthrow11220 8mo ago
It’s like that but if the blindfolded free throw shooter was also the scorekeeper and the referee & told you with complete confidence that the ball went in, when you looked away for a second.