hravnx

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by hravnx 11y ago

   If you think the software methodologies of Olden Times did not consider the role of people in the software development process you are mistaken. They might seem archaic (and even wrong) when we look at them today, but still: smart people pu
2. 2.▲
   by hravnx 11y ago

   "There was almost no thought around how software should be developed." Really, Joel? So all the various software methodologies of the seventies and eighties, all the CASE tools of the nineties, Extreme Programming etc etc etc -
3. 3.▲
   by hravnx 11y ago

   It's fairly sad that the "script for the future" is (partly) being written by people who consider a mere 665 words a "wall of text" that is OK to comment on, but apparently too long to read.
4. 4.▲
   by hravnx 11y ago

   I really, really like the F# language, but the tooling is so bad (compared to C#) that it's a real struggle to continue to justify using it. I admire the effort put in to F# Power Tools development (I've been using it for a long t
5. 5.▲
   by hravnx 13y ago

   Out-of-the-box VS 2013 (and C# development) is so far ahead of Eclipse (and Java development) that it isn't even the same sport. The myth that Eclipse users try to perpetuate that "you must buy Resharper just to be able to work in
6. 6.▲
   by hravnx 13y ago

   PowerShell is awesome. A shell with proper intellisense, a real object pipeline, string interpolation and cool meta-programming facilities - to mention just a few areas where it runs rings around bash.