howells

6 ms·

1.
by howells 14y ago
You should go for it. Especially because finding good examples of ecomm done well is hard , so there's definitely a niche.
2.
by howells 14y ago
I don't agree nor disagree with you. :-) A great site is only great with good content - be it either text or images. There are plenty of sites to be found on there where imagery is sparse but the typography is beautiful.
3.
A few things I learned from redesigning and redeveloping siteInspire(howells.ws)
2 points by howells 14y ago|0 comments
4.
by howells 14y ago
No. I'm just going on the assumption that everyone would like to see traffic to their site, and I make it clear in the footer that all screenshots are the copyright of their owners. In its history (since 2009) I've had one take down request
5.
by howells 14y ago
Cool! (Total HN noob here - how do I PM?)
6.
by howells 14y ago
I take all the shots manually. If I were to do it automatically (maybe I will in the future) I would use this: http://url2png.com/ - great results.
7.
SiteInspire — web design inspiration(siteinspire.com)
28 points by howells 14y ago|15 comments
8.
by howells 14y ago
I don't get errors, but none of the sites actually look any different to their original state for me...
9.
by howells 14y ago
Their argument is that commentary on the original Digg was essentially the first of its kind, whereas commentary happens "everywhere" and they need to spend time aggregating commentary too. Not sure how they can do this effectively, but wil
10.
by howells 15y ago
It's a great article, and here's my take on it in response: http://howells.ws/posts/view/72/on-the-iosification-of-os-x-...