hodder

5 ms·

1.
by hodder 6d ago
Cosmic expansion happens uniformly rather than through a local gravitational pull. In physics, "we" use the raisin bread analogy where when you bake the bread, the raisins are all getting uniformly distant from each other with no
2.
Jacob Coxon resignation appears to be a PR stunt for AI regulation(twitter.com)
28 points by hodder 7d ago|4 comments
3.
by hodder 7d ago
The problem is no one wants a META agent. so yes LLMs are great. And still no one wants to use a Zuckerberg one.
4.
by hodder 8d ago
muse is probably an awesome technological innovation and will still completely flop bc it’s a consumer product outside of social from Meta. It’s a solution in search of a problem. I get why the company wants this. I don’t get why any consum
5.
by hodder 20d ago
I don’t get how this differs from any other optimization harness. The problem is clear, but I’m not sure on what this company is doing that is unique to solve it.
6.
by hodder 20d ago
You mean like Carney did in January? Trump cannot be shown reason once he has convinced himself his gut feel is correct.
7.
by hodder 21d ago
The ideal VC startups are low capex, high ROIC companies. Energy almost universally requires massive capex to achieve a dime in revenue, and capital intensity never really subsides. YC has funded energy focused startups in the past (eg. Okl
8.
by hodder 28d ago
Id be more weary of saying I didn't use AI.
9.
by hodder 1mo ago
People repeat this rhetoric all the time, but I promise you, finance professionals can and do easily migrate to other messaging platforms such as ICE chat. This isn't a moat for BBG
10.
by hodder 1mo ago
Excel succeeds in the business world because users interact with visible data directly on the screen rather than relying on abstract database storage and retrieval. Non-technical workers can build functional tools rapidly, outperforming tra
11.
by hodder 1mo ago
And not a single person cares. What does fully valid even mean anymore?
12.
by hodder 1mo ago
This is like the stupid Meta Portal. It doesnt matter how good it is, no one will use it bc no one trusts them. Right or wrong.
13.
by hodder 2mo ago
Economically if you are vastly outcompeted by other programmers on productivity, yes that is "no longer of value" from a purely employment perspective. Much like an old person who cant use a computer has little value in the job ma
14.
by hodder 2mo ago
Sure. But the market is littered with companies you can invest in. You don't "need" to bet on any single one of them.
15.
by hodder 2mo ago
But why would you want to buy a company where the valuation reflects an extremely optimistic outcome already? Basically you are assuming obscene growth from SpaceX in AI, datacenters, rocket launches etc just to for the stock to go nowhere.
16.
by hodder 3mo ago
I agree man. I’m just quoting Donald.
17.
by hodder 3mo ago
Forgive me because I do not understand the supply chain for memory. With Micron et al effectively scalping their customers with an oligopoly on probably the lowest intellectual IP in the chain, does this not guarantee 10 years from now a) W
18.
by hodder 3mo ago
Forgive me because I do not understand the supply chain for memory. With Micron et al effectively scalping their customers with an oligopoly on probably the lowest intellectual IP in the chain, does this not guarantee 10 years from now a) W
19.
by hodder 3mo ago
The claim that Alberta is actively trying to get rid of all wind and solar development is internet hyperbole that ignores real capacity data. Alberta actually ranks second in Canada for clean energy growth, and its renewable output surged b
20.
by hodder 3mo ago
Your arguments are much lower quality than an LLM will generate. You are so transparently biased against them it is shocking. I’d certainly rather learn from an LLM than someone like you who is both grossly misinformed and a dick about it.
21.
by hodder 3mo ago
They absolutely are good at checking work. It really depends on the level and you are grossly underestimating their ability and over generalizing their limitations. To say an LLM can’t grade pretty much any undergraduate level or under subj
22.
by hodder 3mo ago
On average yes this is almost certainly true. As I said above technology is a lever and most people are incredibly lazy. However if one has drive and determination they are also incredibly powerful tools
23.
by hodder 3mo ago
Spot on analogy.
24.
by hodder 3mo ago
See my response above on this.
25.
by hodder 3mo ago
recently vibe-coded a personalized skateboarding block-training app. The platform maps curated YouTube tutorials to specific tricks I want to learn, logs my daily progress, and tracks failure rates alongside the specific reasons for missed
26.
by hodder 3mo ago
Once more, you are making massively blanketed biased assumptions about me. You seem to believe LLMs cannot even produce simple exams and rubrics is that right?
27.
by hodder 3mo ago
When did I say I wasn't doing and just reading. That is your own heavy bias creeping in.
28.
by hodder 3mo ago
Your initial response post was to me, and you absolutely injected the heavily biased assumption that I was doing no active learning.
29.
by hodder 3mo ago
Sifting through information to separate truth from fiction is a modern, experience-based skill that I’ve developed YES. However, your perspective on how LLMs are used might be too narrow. While no one is suggesting using an AI to find a one
30.
by hodder 3mo ago
You are very closed minded. LLMs can absolutely give pragmatic and fast information in a useful (non-sycophantic form). You need to examine your extreme biases here. Just because you can't use a tool doesn't mean the tool isnt use

More ›