hnnnnng

8 ms·

1.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
We're in the bay area.
2.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Nope. As long as your idea is reasonable(which is a high chance assuming you have your head on straight which is clearly not the case if you're doing stuff like developing an 'elixir for immortality' or building a 'googl
3.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Thats silly. You never start out trying to get acquihired unless you know exactly what the company you want to get acquihired by, wants. You aim super high for an ipo but if stuff goes south, you can always get acquihired.
4.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Except they're not doing that. Quite the opposite infact, they've invented a lot of the malware themselves. maybe this too. If I cant have my cake at least i can choose not to fucking pay for someone else(taxes). Smartass.
5.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
only in a "free-"market. Also there is a concept of "fair price" for a reason. You can't charge insane prices everywhere, especially for essential items.
6.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Performance would grant us the best reason to switch. Because otherwise we are quite satisfied with mongo. I have seen the technical comparison. I will keep an eye out for the performance results. Thanks for letting me know.
7.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
I really like the idea behind rethink and the concept as well. I've also looked at documentation and it seems very simple to use. Also, I understand that 'benchmarking' databases is extremely situational and generally inaccur
8.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Unfortunately, lack of evidence that he has funded YC Companies is not evidence that hes a bad VC. I'm not saying he isn't, instead, if you could provide proof from various (more than 5) founders that have obtained funding from hi
9.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Theres no way to win, is there? One doesn't state that he/she has probably made mistakes == person is implying he's never given bad advice. One does state that he/she has probably made mistakes == its the "ol'
10.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Insane overreactions are becoming extremely commonplace and quite frankly, its very disillusioning. I'm extremely disappointed in the tech community. Being an ass is not the same as discriminating against or hating a group of people.
11.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
So, loans are the answer to everything? Are corporations guaranteeing higher wages and certain jobs to everyone with degrees? What about : http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/ripping-off-young-... from http
12.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
How? Because of a vicious cycle that begins with the low wages. You pay someone low wages so: 1) their kids can't pay for college => they can't get a proper education => lack of education/skillset in the kids 2) their k
13.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
The solution? How about increasing the wage so that these guys dont have to work more than 20 hours a day? How about taking a loss of a billion dollars to reduce profit from 7 billion to 6 billion but in return provide for a better life for
14.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
#1 is flat out wrong. THERE IS NO SECURITY! Is mcdonalds right? paying people so little that they need another job to not be out on the street? How is that TAKING CARE of employees? Before you say mcdonalds is an exception, theres so many o
15.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
So beautifully voices exactly what I've been thinking.
16.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
If you're being picky please THINK before blurting. It says life could involve CELLS. Which is plural. Which points towards multi-cellular and NOT single-cellular organisms. Also look at definitions of cell. All of which imply cell as
17.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Do risks make something not worth doing? If it was the case, we wouldnt have airplanes because they can cause a fatal accidents. NASA wouldn't have attempted any shuttle launches because that can and has caused fatal accidents. Medicin
18.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
'infiltrated by feds' is a presumption based on speculation at this point. Assumptions dont 'correctly reflect events'. If you want to fix something, fix it entirely.
19.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
If cops have to break the law to save someone then the law is at fault. But I cannot, for the life of me, think of any such scenario. As for exposing corruption or being a whistleblower, there are many who want to modify laws to make it eas
20.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Whats gonna happen? People are not going to stop going to MIT. The market it is in is education which is always growing and (sadly) the majority of people don't care what happened to Aaron Schwartz. MIT will still retain its top positi
21.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
Well by funding, they are helping adblock. And, assuming its true that their(Google's) own ads are NOT blocked, it means adblock(and by extension Google) is negatively impacting only the competitors. So in this case, the comparison is
22.
by hnnnnng 13y ago
You make valid points but his are more valid. Certainly the reward should reflect the risk taken but at present the reward is horribly skewed in the direction of founders + investors. Employees, who are extremely important, get much less in