hmm_really

8 ms·

1.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Developers that contribute to an open source code, or to the single maintainer of a open source project? How is the payment distributed proportionally to each contributor? Or is it the case that the lead maintainer can decide to receive fun
2.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Did the organist obtain permission (appropriate license) to do so? Or is it the case he did but its not possible to communicate that to YouTube? Very different problems, one is failure to understand copyright the other is YouTube having a p
3.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Its not cheaper per impact, however you need to buy bigger numbers, millions typically.
4.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Which no 'modern' web developer would go anywhere near!
5.
by hmm_really 8y ago
fair swap
6.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Is this open to Europeans and have you heard of GDPR?
7.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Too much language/syntax to learn in my opinion, prefer something succinct that I can build up from.
8.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Don't kids get taught a functional language at Uni anymore? It would appear it stopped at probably the same time they started teaching Java. Which is why some developers like my self are a bit amused by the younger generation be amaze
9.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Most people are ignorant then :)
10.
by hmm_really 8y ago
Yep PR release, help keep shareholders happy. However I would argue hiring a 'suit' who was CTO for a reputable knowledge based AI company 8 years ago, and since been in a strategic position during Googles recent progress is more
11.
by hmm_really 8y ago
There is an assumption with some of these responses that you want to learn ML for career progression. If so, are you really interested in ML or do you just think its the hot bandwagon of the moment which you want to jump on to get ahead? I
12.
by hmm_really 8y ago
I did a 1st year Uni project using GA to evolve neural network topology in 1996 ... maybe I should dig that out and get me some VC $.
13.
by hmm_really 9y ago
meh hate all these handouts based solutions, devalues the effort of the developers. If I do something I'd rather get paid or not at all and I've chosen that, rather than cap out looking for tips.
14.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Okay thats the bit that I was missing, seems a reasonable compromise!
15.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Well having written a lot of C and a lot of data structures, particular in low resource devices, I'm well aware of the details needed to do so. I suspect many others are in the same camp. Pointers are hard, however after 10 years of
16.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Thats simply wrong, educate yourself young man!
17.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Sign of the times I guess, what would of once of been a neat C macro, is now marketing news in the tech industry.
18.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Because mostly its all about the coin, there are no users, only speculators... ahhh but build it and they will come mentality rules here!
19.
by hmm_really 9y ago
There is also a significant cases of: 1. The false disintermediation; when really they want to put themselves as the intermediary 2. This is so much better than what exists, we just need everyone to adopt it at once, in order to get the net
20.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Looks like a genetic algorithm to me, just framed it differently to normal (which is clever). The hyperparams being the DNA and a network being an environment in which they are executed against.
21.
by hmm_really 9y ago
You do know there is a BlazegraphDB also?
22.
by hmm_really 9y ago
What inferencing does it offer to RDF? How would I bolt on an inference engine to this if none is offered, i.e. to provide OWL:RL?
23.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Its not W3C who produced the US law, is that so difficult to understand? If the US law changes, then the w3c standard still stands, I don't think anyone involved in W3C thinks preventing security researchers doing their job is a sensib
24.
by hmm_really 9y ago
EFF argument was highly politicised and conflating US law, with global technology standardisation. Quite simply EFF had a weaker argument, even though there is a lot of sympathy for their cause from representatives in W3C, who also think US
25.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Well please provide some examples of what you explicitly mean, and then we can see if your wrong or not.
26.
by hmm_really 9y ago
By new model, do you mean Licensing? You do know this is not new right? You never fully owned that CD, you owned the physical object, but not the content, you only had permission to play it under certain conditions.
27.
by hmm_really 9y ago
"I find myself less trusting of the EFF than I was before reading it. Is there a short descriptive term for "alienating your allies by obfuscating the details in an attempt to make a stronger case than the evidence actually suppor
28.
by hmm_really 9y ago
meh where to start with this ... So it was this kind of hyperbole that largely did EFF a disservice in my opinion. The W3C is composed of very experienced people who can see through straw man arguments and unsubstantiated facts. The main ar
29.
by hmm_really 9y ago
Grab it while you can, it won't last, and then there will be a load of people on market with inflated salary expectations.