hleach

6 ms·

1.
by hleach 6y ago
I don't believe it is that rational. It's an ideological assessment, not a risk assessment. If you agree with the people holding the guns, you feel safer with them. If you agree with the people holding the rock, you feel safer wit
2.
by hleach 6y ago
I think resolution would benefit from people being honest about their motives and less logical fallacies. It seems that your motive is much larger than this specific issue at hand and is being guided by a desire to promote an overarching id
3.
by hleach 6y ago
I'm not sure how you are mistaking my want for transparency on where my money is going with a moral decision. Is every purchase a moral decision to you perhaps? It seems you are very much pitching libertarianism here. Perhaps I am not
4.
by hleach 6y ago
I'm not sure what you mean, takeout is typically 10% to 20% cheaper than the same food served to you at the table.
5.
by hleach 6y ago
For every sophisticated business person there are four that need basic math and accounting explained to them. It's all too common to see them base their entire business around a single percentage above total raw ingredient cost. While
6.
by hleach 7y ago
You know that reinforcing habit is not about this trivial example. You are arguing in bad faith. We've spent the last 20 years cleaning up after the shoddy work of this exact attitude.
7.
by hleach 7y ago
They are nearly equivalent in terms of functional security. Function isn't everything though. One example shows an awareness of the security issue and good habit being used despite the low impact. I'd argue that there is a securit
8.
by hleach 7y ago
Just for an example. How about debugging a non trivial issue between a program and a dynamically loaded library. You can't just scan the IAT/PLT. You are going to have to find load points or manually step through, and maybe calcul
9.
by hleach 7y ago
Required? No, but I didn't say impossible. I said "more difficult". Made easier by? Most everything ever loaded in a debugger.
10.
by hleach 7y ago
So yes, you are correct it's being encrypted dynamically at the hardware level. You just debug in a system without these protections turned on then.
11.
by hleach 7y ago
I agree. I'm not sure I understand your point though. This isn't contrary to anything I said. I mention unpacking which would be a pre-debugger process. I believe you are just being pedantic about my use of the word "debuggin
12.
by hleach 7y ago
You are conflating the act of debugging with the operation of a "debugger". Sure you can start at 0 and step forward one instruction at a time, but how often do you do that without at least looking at the code? Not being able to l
13.
by hleach 7y ago
This looks like it goes way beyond ASLR. There are a series of different protections they are doing. It's not clear if they intend them to be uniquely switchable or if they were just separating them to indicate which attack techniques
14.
Expanding Bug Bounties on Google Play(security.googleblog.com)
1 points by hleach 7y ago|0 comments
15.
by hleach 7y ago
The thing is, it's not really genre bashing. These "genres" mostly fit very comfortably into their parent category. Even to the point that if you treat it as a strict history of the music, the majority of the subgenres are un
16.
by hleach 7y ago
I am kind of shocked at the conversation above simply because of how evidently right you are. Does she have an agenda? Yes clearly. She isn't hiding it. She has a long history of laying it right out in the open. Does Amazon have an age
17.
by hleach 7y ago
A salt can't do it's job when it's reused. There are WPA rainbow tables for common ssid's available online. If your ssid is "Linksys" it takes only moments to look up a weak password.