hkleppe

6 ms·

1.
by hkleppe 4mo ago
I've started spending each github outage planning our move to an alternative. I guess I'm not alone. Where are you all moving?
2.
by hkleppe 4mo ago
"No moat", well... How I see this is that its so important to bundle the model with the right tooling. Like a racecar, having the best engine doesn't help if the rest of the car lacks other winning properties (reliability, ae
3.
by hkleppe 6mo ago
aha, so I need more karma
4.
by hkleppe 6mo ago
what, can I change the topbar color?
5.
by hkleppe 10mo ago
You have to realise there is a almost full complete disconnect between engineering and business value
6.
by hkleppe 1y ago
Relatively long distances of road and power transmission lines to reach the two most remote locations. Especially considering they seem to be limited in capacity (only 319 and 469MW). Curious to know if something bigger was in the plans, or
7.
by hkleppe 4y ago
I see it differently. I see the low-code stuff as an opportunity to let the business-folks handle the usecases where the complexity is low, and value of rapid iteration with deep domain-knowledge is more valuable. Also, they might get a bet
8.
by hkleppe 4y ago
> My main issue with low-code/no-code is that it attempts to solve the complexity problem, without understanding what "complexity" is. I get your point. But without low/no-code tools I would argue a lot of simple work
9.
by hkleppe 12y ago
For a different perspective, have a look at this post. A statement posted by Team Vestas navigator Wouter Verbraak once they got back to civilization: http://sailinganarchy.com/2014/12/04/walking-tall/ W
10.
by hkleppe 14y ago
Not really. But you can tell your ISP it is not RFC compliant, I will tell mine.