hirako2000

6 ms·

1.
by hirako2000 3d ago
The government did request the data. And since the announcement, it has requested highly sensitive data again, and to keep such data, backed by threats of violent repercussions, that businesses cease to operate or to even exist. That's
2.
by hirako2000 3d ago
You could argue that the government agency is at fault. 1 for their breach, 2 more importantly: for mandating that personal information get handed over without an official court order which would have involved a far more stringent process w
3.
by hirako2000 4d ago
Sounds like what artisans faced when suggested they better operate those machines that produce more widgets, faster, cheaper.
4.
by hirako2000 5d ago
It isn't pointing at particular system to blame. But if you feel like it's raining, it probably is.
5.
by hirako2000 5d ago
Such book could be distilled in simple essence: - stay out of it for your sanity - sell your soul, organically adapt by looking at those who make it to the top fast
6.
by hirako2000 10d ago
They are neutral. So violent terrorist activity is cracked down via their provider. So called secondary sanctions.
7.
by hirako2000 10d ago
So the oppression does work. It won't stop.
8.
by hirako2000 10d ago
> ERR_UNEXPECTED_PROXY_AUTH
9.
by hirako2000 11d ago
Like pikapod?
10.
by hirako2000 13d ago
> But a cancer grows from a cell that a body needs in small, healthy amounts, and that turns deadly when it grows without limit until it harms, or even kills, its host I thought a cancer grew from a defective cell that is able to divide
11.
by hirako2000 13d ago
Content not viewable in your region.
12.
by hirako2000 14d ago
There is that, but RLHF is a stronger influence. People who asked to build a cool HTML and JavaScript thing, or things of that sort were more pleased to see working shaders and other cool visual effects that are obscure to create (for most)
13.
by hirako2000 14d ago
Let's make it a hackathon, Google will be happy to act as sponsor. With a prize of the max consumed tokens lunatics.
14.
by hirako2000 14d ago
Then you end up with the false positives. I once made a counter judge, and a loop to make corrections deemed true positives. The loop cost me a lot and still left the results to be desirable.
15.
by hirako2000 14d ago
The difference is that one is malicious one isn't. One can be blamed and because it learned over evolution that paying the consequence is (typically) not worth it, it does it less. We are in a situation where a technology was developed
16.
by hirako2000 14d ago
Filling the large context does that yes. But a good agents.md, starting from a clean slate, and specifying which key files to look into and follow the standards allows me to build gigantic projects even I struggle to keep in my head structu
17.
by hirako2000 14d ago
For comparative tracking we do need to stick to the same criteria, I'm with you. I also agree some political factions, in particular those not in control, favour higher numbers. Those in place would rather minimise it. The stance to us
18.
by hirako2000 14d ago
I agree moms who would not be able to work while raising babies/toddlers, or simply prefer not to, shouldn't count as members of the labor force. However. It is very difficult to determine what makes a mom employed vs not employed
19.
by hirako2000 14d ago
I'm asking how come is that not a revelation, your answer is primarily that it's fallacious numbers for the headline. You may be right, but reality is the majority of people take the official unemployment rate without even underst
20.
by hirako2000 15d ago
The revelation is that the official unemployment rate is so skewed it is meaningless, even misleading since high unemployment is a serious social issue thus should be a high priority political concern.
21.
by hirako2000 15d ago
It is typically who is able to be part of the labour force. remove the elderly, those for who it would be illegal to work or still engaged in formal education, the so significantly handicapped no work is manageable. So it is an age group, w
22.
by hirako2000 17d ago
I agree the legislation simply makes consent a requirement, and browsers could have implemented a flag from the get go for websites to read from. Glad it is now in place.
23.
by hirako2000 17d ago
OpenAI bought a hyped ingenious idea, plagued with holes, thinking it could surf the wave.
24.
by hirako2000 17d ago
Exactly like GDPR shouldn't have mandated millions of websites to pop up a consent form, as a global browser setting could would have set consent as a user preference. But the objective of these regulations aren't what it says on
25.
by hirako2000 18d ago
Nextjs is also a bundler for web applications. And it deploys the front end assets. It's yet another backend framework, added that it only runs on vercel infrastructure. There are better front end and back end servers, those that simpl
26.
by hirako2000 19d ago
I did mention they were anecdotes. I never found a sub reddit talking about the side effects of mineral water, how eating apples regularily lowered their libidos, on that sleeping on a mattress made them senile. At some point common sense p
27.
by hirako2000 19d ago
All it shows is that openai is likely still subsidizing inference, sees no value in integration buried within other branded tooling competing with theirs.
28.
by hirako2000 19d ago
How so? A dozen very capable models out there. And the gap between frontier models from the two main US labs kept narrowing, at this point non existent. The quality/price ratio is clearly superior when running Qwen, GLM, or Deepseek. T
29.
by hirako2000 19d ago
No Pi, no Aider either.
30.
by hirako2000 19d ago
Distilling merely saves an expensive part of the process: hundreds of millions. So even if distilling wasn't a thing, what justifies trillions ?

More ›