hildenae

5 ms·

1.
by hildenae 2y ago
It says it was newer published (before now), so would not 2025 be correct?
2.
by hildenae 2y ago
Because reasons i don't remember, I ended up doing all my scraping through Firefox (i think it was easier to make PDFs?). Is there something like this that works for running (non-headless) Firefox?
3.
by hildenae 2y ago
A bit weird to suggest NameCheap for domains when Cloudflare also sells domains, and spesifically only charge you the registrar fee for the domain.
4.
by hildenae 2y ago
I understand that "with/in your web browser" implies a extention or simmilar, but i have good experience using Selenium and Python to scrape websites. Some sites are trickier than others, and when you are instrumenting a brow
5.
by hildenae 2y ago
I may have understood wrong, but i am pretty sure the NanoKVM is ruining Linux ...
6.
by hildenae 2y ago
I have a single feature i miss from Kagi - optional search history - i sometimes find myself unable to find exactly that article/bloggpost/documentation i found using some search words i don't remember from last week.
7.
by hildenae 2y ago
Does this way to write an implementation have a name?
8.
by hildenae 2y ago
As other comments have mentioned - they do not want to decompile the source, they want a clean-room-implementation.
9.
by hildenae 2y ago
Is the answer not supposed to be ~47.24 inches?
10.
by hildenae 2y ago
It is a good explanation of what is happening. However, I think that many of not most Python linters will warn you about this. It is perfectly valid, and something you might actually want , so it should not throw an error.
11.
by hildenae 6y ago
Could this solution be extended with a openssl pipe to offer encryption?