hfuyf65

8 ms·

1.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Not awful, but misleading. You can fake name any file extension anything ala quake approach to data files being archives.
2.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Huh? Bunch of horny teens sharing fake pictures of nudes. Forgive me, but assuming ill intent is what is dangerous here.
3.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Is it because it seems the value can be imitated so easily?
4.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
It is hard to argue against this comment, because it is not even factually accurate if we accept framing as valid ( it isn't ). Can defend why Obamacare marked government interference and , for example, not medicare?
5.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Some of what I am about to say is state specific ( in my case IL ), so take this into consideration. Income is a consideration for any help. Married couple will have higher documented income, while unmarried cohabiting couple won't. In
6.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
It is kinda fascinating. I just returned from US roadtrip ( UT region ) and there is a lot of unused space. Remote could help with a lot of it were it not for 'old school management'( quotation marks, because that is the current P
7.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Its effects may be more visible, because in previous iterations society condemned children out of wedlock so data on it was not as reliable. Naturally, potential solutions would result in rather unwelcome dystopias that could be encapsulate
8.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Or.. remove benefits.
9.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Anecdote incoming. Usual disclaimers apply. I genuinely am not sure what true numbers are. Couple#1 They are married for a good while with three kids. He is a cop in Chicago; she has semi-random kid watching gigs. While it did not happen, t
10.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Hmm. My point is that Carlin did not start with 7 words. That is what he is famous for, but he didn't magically show up that day to recors that line out of the blue. I am too lazy to dig it up now, but youtube has multiple interviews t
11.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
It is not that unpopular. I suppose I appreciate his contributions a lot, but I agree about the kernel of truth approach rather than holy gospel. I just happen to think he forced a lot of people to think. This one of those things some of hi
12.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Thank you. This is why I keep coming back here. I would not have stumbled on it on my own. It hits quite hard for me.
13.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Disagree, but can you substantiate hypocrite claim? Also cancellation chance seems to depend on how 'big' you are. Chapelle wasn't cancelled despite attempts. I suspect Carlin would get in trouble, but since he had a strong f
14.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Sure. We are not threading new ground here; this has been covered better by people much smarter than me. I am simplifying for the sake of brevity. It may help to think of it as a range.
15.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Not yet, but if you watch early Carlin it is the same pattern: 1. initially safe,sanitized corporate friendly jokes 2. some commercial success 3. ? 4. jokes increasingly become a social commentary and are less and less 'friendly'
16.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
If they resonate well, it either means the population as whole thinks it is accurate or that the population as a wholr is wrong. Either is possible, but I think you are wrong about Carlin being wrong. Language defines the quality of our con
17.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
He would have had a field day if he was alive. It is a loss for all of us that he is gone. Still, we now have Chapelle, who is building similiar legacy and potentially Bill Burr one day. Absolute agreement on the philosopher/jester vib
18.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
This censorship is in a capital of a western power. We can condemn Hamas AND condemn failing democratic society by not upholding basic freedoms that built it.
19.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Another cat and mouse game. I got the same message the other day. I noted it, but also ignored it. It is possible adblockers officially became mainstream. Part of me ia happy about it. Part of me is concerned companies will respond in the w
20.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2ozjiX1E7ZA&pp=ygUTc2JmIGludGV... Picked an interview ar random. He is not charismatic, but he can talk like so many banking VPs talk ( almost no substance ). This may have helped him make
21.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Vacancy tax seems like an easy solution until you start thinking about implementation. How do you expect to enforce it?
22.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Could you elaborate? I disagree just because of the basic human nature, but I am curious about your rationale for the statement above.
23.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
Anger is a valid emotion, but it does not advance the conversation or gain you adherents to your cause. Here, it will almost certainly do the opposite. Just to give you an idea, you could have easily undermined the argument that reaction to
24.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
You are right about the argument in itself. It is poor. But the argument is not in meat of the argument, but in optics. The perception of things as 'rules for me but not for thee' almost immediately overrules even basic logic. In
25.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
That is ok though. He offset ( current magic word indicating its all good ).
26.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
And this is where the resentment came from as well. It was always well understood that HR is not exactly there to help you, but I know I personally snapped at one drone ( and eventually quit ) over those inflexible policies dictated from cl
27.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
<<What's so precious about "data"? No one knows except the deciding party since someone else decided that you do not get to evaluate whether it is precious. There is a deep distrust in me for anyone who: 1) engages in t
28.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
In practical sense, how would one differentiate one from the other? The end result is the same: data is missing. I understand your point, but I can't help wondering if you considered what could happen if that approach was adopted.
29.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
<<defining "misinformation" gets very tricky when you start breaking it down to local specifics Would you not agree it is a strong argument against government wielding that kind of enormous power?
30.
by hfuyf65 3y ago
It is kinda fascinating is it not? A person genuinely clamoring for the state to carefully control what they they can say/do/think.

More ›