hervature

7 ms·

1.
by hervature 4mo ago
The Fed (with a capital F) refers to the Federal Reserve which explicitly does not control tax policy.
2.
by hervature 4mo ago
Are you going to address that your statement does not square with the fact that the majority of the people in the 1870 census were not foreigners (born abroad) and therefore did not immigrate?
3.
by hervature 4mo ago
Yes. That is how they differentiated "True population" and "Constitutional population". They also have two "Indian population" line items for on and off reservation. That footnote does not mean they were not co
4.
by hervature 4mo ago
Are you being dense on purpose? The US has been a country for 250 years and the Mayflower landed 400 years ago. Most of the people were born in the US.
5.
by hervature 4mo ago
Here is the 1870 census of the USA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1870_United_States_census Note, indigenous people were less than 1%. New York City had the largest proportion of immigrants at 45%. Your claims of &quot
6.
by hervature 5mo ago
Heat pump sales for energy costs.
7.
by hervature 5mo ago
Define "For a long time now". The Republican party controlled California for 75% of the 1900s with the Democrats coming in power in the last quarter of the century. This is well after California established itself as an economic p
8.
by hervature 5mo ago
I am a Canadian and I think you are demonstrating an unreal amount of cope thinking that this will have any meaningful impact on migration trends. The NAFTA agreement (and followups) allow the free-flow of professionals between the countrie
9.
by hervature 5mo ago
When the bad guys are too impatient to wait until you leave the computer but not fast enough to stop you before 30 degrees while keeping the convenience of life.
10.
by hervature 6mo ago
That is not a dodge. Look at the "one long term increase" and "two long term decrease" and compare the estimated populations. You have 2644 vs 618+900=1518. So, if the rest of the population is "insufficient data&qu
11.
by hervature 6mo ago
Read the words before the second part: """ Go look at the data yourself: [link] You will find that the population has been stable globally [...] """ I am summarizing their own analysis. If you go look in the da
12.
by hervature 6mo ago
To be clear, I have not changed my claim. I am merely point out that even the polar bear people say that it is not in decline and, for some reason, refuse to say what their own data says, which is global population is on the rise. From thei
13.
by hervature 6mo ago
Thank you. You read my post for its substance and interacted with it in good faith. You are a true HNer and if you are ever in LV, I will gladly buy you a beer.
14.
by hervature 6mo ago
Did you even read that article? It says the measurements from 1960-1980 are unreliable so the claim is false but the trend still works from 1980. Go look at the data yourself: https://www.iucn-pbsg.org/population-status&#x2F
15.
by hervature 6mo ago
To be honest, I just looked up the report and did not not notice it came from there. My only agenda was that it was the only report that clearly showed the average and CI of the different studies throughout the years. WWF links to the actua
16.
by hervature 6mo ago
The polar bear population has steadily been increasing since the 1960s [1]. Basically double what it was. The more falsifiable information you use the less you are helping the cause. [1] - https://thegwpf.org/content/up
17.
by hervature 6mo ago
I am not sure what point you are trying to make. When it comes to the Olympics, it was decided a long time ago that having both men and women's events was beneficial for societal progress to have both sexes represented. This was at a t
18.
by hervature 6mo ago
I am going to try to keep my response apolitical to try to avoid fanning a culture war. That Wiki is the exact reason we are in this situation because we are bringing up points for 1 in 20000 or 0.005% of the population. Any system designed
19.
by hervature 8mo ago
I highly doubt they did this correlation properly. It looks like they just correlated two time series. Both series are correlated with time (both go up over time) and not each other. I eyeballed the series and correlated just the directions
20.
by hervature 8mo ago
> The alternative is as in the US, where anyone can produce milk, and the price craters, and farmers need to be constantly bailed out. Do you have references to bailouts specifically for dairy farms? The big bailouts recently were due to
21.
by hervature 8mo ago
If that's the case, just scrap the demo. They literally kept the script "let us show you what it looks like".
22.
by hervature 8mo ago
Whoever approved making a robot look like it is about to dance before awkwardly panning to a "static" model should not be making those decisions. It literally killed the vibe in the room. People went from the verge of freaking out
23.
by hervature 9mo ago
I am just trying to help you write better. Your writing says "if I had to give up either AI or chocolate [...] I would probably choose AI". However, your language and intent seems to be that you would give up chocolate.
24.
by hervature 9mo ago
I know you are using the definition of tyrant here to be "unjust ruler" as opposed to "absolute ruler". You can certainly have benevolent tyrants but I would argue that, without a constitution, you are by definition rule
25.
by hervature 10mo ago
While you are being downvoted, this is actually an astute observation. However, your point is working against you in this case. If the vaccine was actually deadly, the unvaccinated individuals who survived the pandemic would be having bette
26.
by hervature 10mo ago
You should read my statement again. If COVID vaccines reduces COVID deaths by 100% and increase everything else by 0.01%, you will still have a reduction in "all-cause" mortality yet your chances of dying by anything else has incr
27.
by hervature 10mo ago
Looking at Table 2 and as the name suggests, COVID is included in "all-cause" mortality. Your statement does not follow because it could have made COVID outcomes better yet "all-other" causes worse for a neutral "no
28.
by hervature 1y ago
Not the OP. I think what they are driving at is that if knowledge is discovered during exploration in cohort A, cohort B can exploit it. Then, the whole A/B test breaks down to which cohort got to benefit more from the bandit learnings
29.
by hervature 1y ago
Why does Liquid do the RWF in person then?
30.
by hervature 1y ago
At a very high level, revenues enter your bank account and expenses leave your bank account. In this case, you are getting confused about the taxes. There is employee compensation (which the business will withhold taxes on behalf of the ind

More ›