herewego

6 ms·

1.
by herewego 1mo ago
Patience is a virtue. It took 30 seconds to load then render an enormous graph that is interactive with zero lag or FPS issues on my mobile Firefox browser.
2.
by herewego 7mo ago
You’re talking about manipulated/malicious/intentfully steered hallucination but the parent is referring to trained emergent hallucination (even if sycophantic). These are two different things and both can occur, but the latter is
3.
by herewego 7mo ago
Would you use FSD with your children in the car? I sure as hell wouldn’t. Progress is not safety.
4.
by herewego 7mo ago
You and I must not drive the same Tesla brand then because my Model Y is a terrifying experience when “self-driving” anywhere besides on highways. I do wonder if folks who say Tesla’s FSD works well and safely are simply lacking a self-pres
5.
by herewego 1y ago
Not arguing against your overall point, but Texas is a well-known lesson in failed power grid management, market design, and policy - which in combination is the driving force behind the current economic energy opportunities. I say this as
6.
by herewego 1y ago
https://archive.is/0xzRe
7.
by herewego 1y ago
You are stating a common misconception. That being that solar owners should be paying for anything other than the cost to push power into the distribution grid. The grid fees solar owners pay account for that. They should not be paid for su
8.
by herewego 2y ago
I read the parent’s comment as arguing that the existence of profits implies exploitation of workers in the quoted instance (p perhaps broadly in England at the time) and that there is some similarity with DeepSeek. No hard-line assertions,
9.
by herewego 2y ago
Distributed energy resources eliminate a large portion of the transmission cost, leaving only the distribution grid in an idealized/future-state scenario (as I assume you’re talking about). In the summer, you lower the solar output so
10.
by herewego 2y ago
Regressive in that solar programs are not inflated, but do require distribution upgrades to realize their efficiency advantages over centralized power transmission. These distribution upgrades are costly to IOUs because they cut into their
11.
by herewego 2y ago
He’s saying Texas is hot for humans, which is objectively true. One’s willingness to tolerate it is subjective, but that’s not the point here. Don’t take it so personally.
12.
by herewego 2y ago
You are uninformed. ERCOT is heavily influenced (“owned”) by Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) and market makers that are profit seeking entities. This is true of all ISOs for all intents and purposes. It is the primary reason why the U.S. gr
13.
by herewego 2y ago
> If you have to verify the details of the work you outsource Yes, they have to verify. Verification is necessary whether or not the component is sourced through a supplier or in-house. Verification happens after the sourcing step. And y
14.
by herewego 2y ago
I can assure you it’s much higher. Much higher.
15.
by herewego 2y ago
That’s very subjective and case dependent. I use local models most often myself with great utility and advocate for giving my companies the choice of using either local models or commercial services/APIs (ChatGPT, GPT-4 API, some Llama
16.
by herewego 2y ago
Many disagree. “Not even close” is a strong position to take on this.
17.
by herewego 2y ago
They are opening themselves up to massive liability even with “fine print” — this is meaningful and should not be disregarded. Just because there’s some super indem clause in their customer agreement doesn’t mean the courts will rule in its
18.
by herewego 2y ago
Agreed. Every time I’ve used it or been in a Tesla as a passenger with FSD engaged, human intervention has been required several times each trip to avoid accidents, harm to pedestrians, or moving violations. It’s frankly embarrassing to use
19.
by herewego 2y ago
This is spot on. The liability difference between L2 and L3 is enormous and key to the progression that this announcement represents.
20.
by herewego 3y ago
Fair enough. Indeed my only point was that lithium-sulfur has production potential, as does solid-state, etc. and that’s where the industry interest originates.
21.
by herewego 3y ago
Who cares? It’s a technology in development intended to help solve an unsolved problem — efficient energy storage. This is research.
22.
by herewego 3y ago
As someone who buys, sells, installs, and operates enormous volumes of battery assets, I disagree. No one I know who is in battery tech for a living is writing off sulfur batteries as napkin-math-interesting only. I’m curious to know who yo
23.
by herewego 3y ago
HuggingFace is the place to go for easily downloading model weights. Search for the user TheBloke if you’re particularly interested in GGUF formatted weights.
24.
by herewego 3y ago
Or they’re simply commenting on Google suffering from a commonplace malady seen in many enterprises.
25.
by herewego 3y ago
This is a bit of a reductionist viewpoint. Perhaps you’re disregarding the emergent properties of fitted functions at scale.
26.
by herewego 3y ago
You have to prove your understanding of consciousness to be certain that LLMs are not conscious. It’s your certainty that I suspect most are reacting to here.
27.
by herewego 3y ago
I’m not sure where you live, but I’ve been privy to thousands of rooftop solar installations deployed in the U.S. (New England mostly) and the common case is to have the inverter wired into the circuit panel with a per-circuit or whole hous
28.
by herewego 3y ago
Also because most (yes, most) people deal with these or similar challenges at some point in their careers. Personal growth is real.
29.
by herewego 3y ago
Agreed and well put. This is one reason why bootstrapping is such an attractive alternative for many who are able.
30.
by herewego 3y ago
How is this different than what any new market entrant encounters? This is what sales and marketing is for; business as usual. I’ve never launched a product that the world was familiar with before I launched it.

More ›