henrikn

9 ms·

1.
by henrikn 5mo ago
Recipe and accompanying video here: https://www.tastinghistory.com/recipes/switchel Tried making it. Certainly interesting! But not something I’ll make again.
2.
"The Terminal Prophet" by Claude Code. An ePub Short Story(gist.github.com)
1 points by henrikn 5mo ago|1 comments
3.
by henrikn 5mo ago
I was going on a train journey, wanted something to read and wondered if there was anything with the premise "someone secretly invented Claude Code before LLMs were a thing and used it as a secret superpower". Then I thought I&#x2
4.
by henrikn 3y ago
Speaking of random third-party JS code, do you know of anything supporting this is actually being run by Fastly, other than it being in the domain name? I did some minor sleuthing here but no clear support yet: https://github.com
5.
by henrikn 6y ago
Agreed, this can be difficult. An approach like BEM can help somewhat because you rely less on cascading. But then again, because it's tediously explicit, one may generate BEM class names in Sass or with PostCSS in a way that makes tho
6.
by henrikn 6y ago
Hi! Blog post author here. I agree that tests are super valuable for many things, but it isn't enough here – at least not with the way my team writes tests. (Our) tests wouldn't catch unused CSS classes or i18n keys. (Our) tests w
7.
by henrikn 10y ago
Another option is to do away with blocking on pull requests altogether and review after the fact. It has some benefits (and some downsides). I blogged about that here: http://thepugautomatic.com/2014/02/code-review
8.
by henrikn 13y ago
Wrong: I'm sure it is. I did it without tests and didn't go through the logic carefully since that wasn't at all the point. The design was. Performance: could be. If your context is one where performance is paramount and trum
9.
by henrikn 13y ago
Also glanced at the load_from_v1 code. I can't argue with the "deprecated code" bit – if you never need to understand or edit that code again, by all means leave it. There will be no payoff for spending time reducing the comp
10.
by henrikn 13y ago
> They're wrong: it's the smallest it can possibly be while still correctly performing the necessary goal; any smaller, and you have to break it into multiple smaller methods that provide no value except keeping Code Climate ha