hellllllllooo

4 ms·

1.
by hellllllllooo 6y ago
https://seoi.net/penint/ I prefer this drawing pad :)
2.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Because it's irrelevant pedantry?
3.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
The article is saying unemployment is very low so your point doesn't stand. The minimum wage isn't hurting employment. What's hurting people are the low wages.
4.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Walmart, Amazon and Target are doing fine and still pay low wages. I don't understand your point or choice of companies to list.
5.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Sure. But it's hardly suprising nor is it a useful comparison to say airpods make more revenue than Twitter.
6.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Most profitable company in the tech world creates new product and uses prior manufacturing skill, brand awareness/loyalty, device lock-in, advertising experience and retail channels to sell it and makes more profit that arbitrary list
7.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
You can always adopt or foster children if you really regret it later. There are plenty of children that exist that need good homes without having to create more.
8.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> Does the fact that black Americans used to be slaves in the US, or were kept out of certain housing markets, contribute towards the fact that black Americans, on average, have lower credit scores, income, wealth, and collateral? Of cou
9.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Even if this is true (which I don't believe based on your anecdotal evidence about Gen Z who max out at age 24), why is it bad?
10.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> I'm just saying that arresting 84% blacks is not necessarily racist _by the cops_, because every one of those 46 arrests may well have a video like this one, and this guy deserved it. Deserves to be detained for eating a sandwich?
11.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Did you watch the video that the article cites? Please do. It's what sparked this study of the statistics and the police behavior in it is completely unreasonable. What you're saying doesn't align at all with what was recorde
12.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
So your claim is despite the black ridership being 10%, black people are more likely to be beligerant or do something else that is somehow hidden but illegal so citing for eating is justified? You're really bending over backwards to gi
13.
Police cited 55 people for eating on San Francisco trains. Only nine were white(theguardian.com)
4 points by hellllllllooo 7y ago|8 comments
14.
San Francisco is launching an office to regulate new tech in public areas(businessinsider.com)
2 points by hellllllllooo 7y ago|0 comments
15.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Sharing a story to a more widely read platform than medium is the value add. But yeah the original article is the source so probably better to start there.
16.
Black Facebook staff describe workplace racism in anonymous letter(theguardian.com)
31 points by hellllllllooo 7y ago|4 comments
17.
Google's harvest of medical data includes names and full details of millions(theguardian.com)
258 points by hellllllllooo 7y ago|115 comments
18.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
The system should have detected and braked and if was incapable of this it shouldn't be on public roads. This is a very simple case of the car failing to detect an object in the road and should be the most basic functionality of a driv
19.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
No. The key point is that Uber engineers under the orders of management disengaged automatic breaking systems to make the car provide a smoother ride. If these had remained on then the pedestrian would be alive whether the driver was distra
20.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Really, you can't understand it? You've never had to work long hours at an unfulfilling, repetitive job you hate just to pay the bills and survive without being able to save anything? You're lucky, a lot of people in the US a
21.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Political advertising is very clear on television. Isn't that the context of this discussion?
22.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> San Francisco spends a lot on its homeless problem with little to show for it. $241 million from a budget of over $12 billion from a city that with businesses that collectively make hundreds of billions every year. Doesn't seem li
23.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
That number is a myth. An intentional butchering of the homeless stats and spending numbers for political purposes. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Myths-like-homel... The number is more like $3800 per
24.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Stripe CEO was actively against paying taxes to support SF homeless through Prop C. This isn't suprising. https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Tech-moguls-wor...
25.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Wait until a derogatory word being used effects you directly. It's really easy to just not use words flippantly that you know some people have an issue with. You are clearly aware of how it can be offensive and for a lot of people your
26.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
You ignored my point and responded with a rant. I didn't make a comment on Catalonia. I was responding to the poster before me.
27.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
I can think of non-evil reasons to stop secession. If the US South wanted to secede to continue slavery is it evil to prevent that to protect people?
28.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> it's basically impossible for an organization to be non-political This is exactly the point. It's impossible for an org to be non-political. Any choice made has wider socitial context and effects for the workers at that compa
29.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Thank you for writing what I was thinking so eloquently. Everyone's life is effected by politics and GitLab is making a political decision as to which politics are acceptable to discuss at work. Politics will still be discussed, but on
30.
Geena Davis announces 'Spellcheck for Bias' tool to redress gender imbalance(theguardian.com)
1 points by hellllllllooo 7y ago|0 comments

More ›