Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hawkeyedan
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
1.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
2y ago
A little more context… This is a real decision I’m making with Common Lisp, Guile and Janet as my current leading options. But … I feel like documenting all the thoughts in an essay/blog form may be helpful to others. (And my post hist
2.
▲
Ask HN: Which Lisp? (Lowercase)
2 points
by
hawkeyedan
2y ago
|
6 comments
3.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Text run by an interpreter. Different strokes.
4.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
It’s not in my mix because it’s a fairly “big” language, which is a huge bonus once you’re proficient but makes it a poor choice for me to dive into Lisp(s). For someone else, that might not be true. But I like to be able to hold things in
5.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
LFE lacks it’s own robust web app development stack … and translating between documentation in Elixir (Phoenix) and Lisp all day will make my head hurt. Clojure is a tougher call. For this project it might be good. However, I want to includ
6.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
While I’ve got you… What’s the state-of-the-art story for package management in Gambit?
7.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Thanks, that’s a very helpful insight. You’ve put my mind a significant ease.
8.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
In my case, web-based just means "it is a piece of software you access via the web." Web application, website, SAAS, whatever. And you're right, I should have considered Gambit. Dang, now I have a ternary decision to make.
9.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Just to be clear: yes, there are other Lisps. Yes, Clojure is cool. Yes, LFE is a thing that exists. Yes Elixir is Lisp-adjacent. Yes, any of those would give me access to a larger ecosystem and the resources of a well used, well supported
10.
▲
Ask HN: Anarki or Racket?
5 points
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
|
16 comments
11.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
To be precise, applets were an early application of Java. But Sun Microsystems actually developed it in the long-standing dream of the “universal binary.” The project began in 1991 targeting set-top boxes. [source]( https://web.ar
12.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
This is a pretty great tool, despite the limitations of existing in iOS-land. It obviously has the same problem any Tor browser has though, you run into bot blocking on a very large % of the regular (non .onion) interwebs. Worth considerati
13.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
And yet I can only read Dante’s original work in Italian!
14.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Arguments about the “superiority” of Python vs Ruby always sound a bit like arguments about the “superiority” of Italian vs Spanish. If you squint a bit they’re basically the same. (By that simile, Lisp would be Sanskrit?)
15.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
So funny that Rails has gone from “exciting” to “boring” in (relatively) the blink of an eye. But boring is good, nice to see it embraced.
16.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Best post I’ve read on this so far!
17.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
This is a really important story. I think about all the requests government agencies make for backdoors to things ... then I read something like this ... Ick.
18.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Of course if you’re one of the platforms, owning some or all of other people’s login processes does happen to be a win for you.
19.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
As somebody who loves databases, I think the real issue that folks are meaning to critique isn’t actually using a “model.” It’s using an ActiveRecord-style ORM (or any ORM) without grokking what lies beneath. A database layer IS a model. It
20.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Bash is bad and ugly… But I just avoided a day’s worth of development of a little command line utility by adding two alias lines that go into .profile.
21.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Sadly, that might not be a great bet. The world of government software procurement is very, very ugly.
22.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Great idea! Thanks for making it!
23.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Hopeful this will get noticed here and folks will go in and comment (presumably positively or with constructive criticism) to make this frequently used .gitignore better.
24.
▲
Let's improve GitHub's recommended Perl .gitignore
(github.com)
1 points
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
|
1 comments
25.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
4y ago
Jumping in on this late, but I think the haters and some of the lovers miss the point. Perl doesn’t need to be Python. It’s great to be the #20 language.
26.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
6y ago
Still wrapping my head around this. And hoping Raku will start to get some mainstream adoption.
27.
▲
New newsletter for JavaScript data science
(twitter.com)
2 points
by
hawkeyedan
7y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
The T-I calculator is awesome
(bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com)
1 points
by
hawkeyedan
12y ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
12y ago
This is a great example of the curative powers of even a little bit if sunlight. Good job PP! Now if only Verizon had shame.
30.
▲
by
hawkeyedan
12y ago
I'd suggest that the guest use case is the most important one and that account generation/creation/etc is for most sites the use case that should come second.
More ›